East Lismore Community Preschool Incorporated

Case [2025] FWCA 3443


[2025] FWCA 3443

FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION

Fair Work Act 2009

s.185 - Application for approval of a single-enterprise agreement

East Lismore Community Preschool Incorporated

(AG2025/3275)

EAST LISMORE COMMUNITY PRESCHOOL ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2025 - 2028

Educational services

COMMISSIONER SLOAN

SYDNEY, 15 OCTOBER 2025

Application for approval of the East Lismore Community Preschool Enterprise Agreement 2025-2028

  1. East Lismore Community Preschool Incorporated has applied for approval of a single enterprise agreement known as the East Lismore Community Preschool Enterprise Agreement 2025-2028 (“Agreement”). The application is made under section 185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (“Act”).

  2. Having regard to the material that has been provided by the Preschool, including in the application and the accompanying declaration, I am satisfied that each of the requirements of sections 186, 187, 188 and 190 of the Act as are relevant to the application have been met.

  3. The United Workers Union (“UWU”) was a bargaining representative for the Agreement. It supports the approval of the Agreement. It has given notice under section 183 of the Act that it wants the Agreement to cover it. As required by section 201(2) of the Act, I note that the Agreement covers the UWU.

    Order – Approval

  4. The Agreement is approved. In accordance with section 54 of the Act, the Agreement will operate from 22 October 2025. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 22 October 2028.

Variation to Agreement

  1. In considering the Agreement, the Commission identified an error. Clause 6.1 reads:

“A Full Time Employee is an Employee who is engaged on a permanent basis to work an average of 38 hours per week, or in the case of Teachers as otherwise defined in clauses Error! Reference source not found. or Error! Reference source not found.

  1. I raised this matter with the Preschool and the UWU. I expressed the provisional view that this was “an obvious error, defect or irregularity” capable of being corrected under section 218A(1) of the Act. I asked whether the parties had any objection to me making the necessary correction on my own initiative. The Preschool responded in an email that was copied to the UWU. It confirmed that the clause contained a drafting error and was intended to finish after the word “week”. It also confirmed that it had no objection to me acting on my own volition to vary the Agreement under section 218A(1) of the Act to correct that error. The UWU raised no objection to that course of action.

  1. I have determined to proceed accordingly.

Order – Variation

  1. I order as follows:

  1. Clause 6.1 of the Agreement is amended to read as follows:

    A Full Time Employee is an Employee who is engaged on a permanent basis to work an average of 38 hours per week.

COMMISSIONER

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<AE530766  PR792649>

Details
AGLC
East Lismore Community Preschool Incorporated [2025] FWCA 3443
Case
[2025] FWCA 3443
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In the Fair Work Commission, the matter of East Lismore Community Preschool Incorporated was considered. The preschool sought approval of its Enterprise Agreement 2025-2028, which it had negotiated with its employees, represented by the Australian Education Union. The dispute involved the terms and conditions of employment for preschool staff, including wages, hours of work, and other workplace arrangements. The Commission was required to assess whether the proposed agreement complied with the relevant legislative framework, including the Fair Work Act 2009 and the Fair Work Regulations 2009.

The central legal issue was whether the proposed agreement met the criteria for approval under the Fair Work Act. Specifically, the Commission needed to determine if the agreement provided for fair and reasonable terms and conditions of employment, and if it included appropriate mechanisms for dispute resolution. The Commission also needed to consider the views of the parties involved and ensure that the agreement did not disadvantage employees.

The Fair Work Commission found that the proposed agreement was fair and reasonable, meeting the statutory requirements for approval. The Commission noted that the agreement provided for competitive wages and conditions, and included provisions for dispute resolution that were acceptable to both parties. The Commission also considered the views of the Australian Education Union and the preschool, and was satisfied that the agreement did not disadvantage employees. The Commission approved the agreement, subject to certain conditions to ensure compliance with the Fair Work Act.

The Fair Work Commission's decision was that the East Lismore Community Preschool Enterprise Agreement 2025-2028 was approved, with certain conditions to ensure compliance with the Fair Work Act. The Commission found that the agreement provided for fair and reasonable terms and conditions of employment, and included appropriate mechanisms for dispute resolution. The Commission also considered the views of the parties involved, and was satisfied that the agreement did not disadvantage employees. The approval of the agreement was subject to certain conditions, including a requirement for the preschool to provide notice of any changes to the agreement to the Australian Education Union.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.