EARLES & HIGHSMITH

In the matter of *Earles & Highsmith*, Collier J considered an application by the father concerning his legal representative's request to list a stay application. The mother was also involved in the proceedings.

The court was required to determine whether to grant leave for the father's legal representative to see a Registrar regarding the listing of the stay application. Additionally, the court had to consider the father's application for costs filed on 24 December 2012, and the costs of both parties for the day's proceedings. The court also had to address an application concerning the Independent Children's Lawyer's costs.

Collier J granted leave for the father's legal representative to consult with a Registrar concerning the listing of the stay application. The father's costs application was adjourned to 27 March 2013. The costs of both parties for the day were reserved. Furthermore, Mr Richardson was directed to provide the mother with a complete set of documents previously sent to her by 20 February 2013 within seven days. The court refused to make any order regarding the Independent Children's Lawyer's costs.