| [2021] FWCA 502 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement
Ealwin Operations Pty Ltd
(AG2020/3890)
EALWIN OPERATIONS PTY LTD ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2020
Building, metal and civil construction industries | |
COMMISSIONER YILMAZ | MELBOURNE, 2 FEBRUARY 2021 |
Application for approval of the Ealwin Operations Pty Ltd Enterprise Agreement 2020.
[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Ealwin Operations Pty Ltd Enterprise Agreement 2020 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by Ealwin Operations Pty Ltd. The Agreement is a single enterprise agreement.
[2] The Employer has provided written undertakings. A copy of the undertakings is attached in Annexure A. I am satisfied that the undertakings will not cause financial detriment to any employee covered by the Agreement and that the undertakings will not result in substantial changes to the Agreement.
[3] Subject to the undertakings referred to above, I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187, 188 and 190 are relevant to this application for approval and have been met.
[4] I observe that clause 10.8.8 of the Agreement is likely to be inconsistent with the National Employment Standards (NES). However, noting clause 3.4.5 of the Agreement, I am satisfied the more beneficial entitlements of the NES will prevail where there is an inconsistency between the Agreement and the NES.
[5] The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54, will operate from 9 February 2021. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 1 February 2025.
COMMISSIONER
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<AE510270 PR726592>
ANNEXURE A
- AGLC
- Ealwin Operations Pty Ltd [2021] FWCA 502
- Case
- [2021] FWCA 502
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The central legal issue before the Commission was whether the agreement complied with the requirements of the Fair Work Act 2009. Specifically, the Commission needed to determine if the agreement fairly reflected the terms and conditions of employment and if it complied with the “better off overall test.” This test ensures that employees are not worse off financially and have at least the same conditions as those previously set by an award or agreement. The Commission also had to consider if the agreement was free from any illegal or unfair terms.
In its decision, the Fair Work Commission carefully examined the provisions of the agreement against the statutory criteria. The Commission found that the agreement met the requirements under the Fair Work Act 2009. It satisfied the better off overall test and contained no illegal or unfair terms. The Commission concluded that the agreement fairly reflected the terms and conditions of employment and provided a reasonable balance of rights and obligations for both the employer and employees. Consequently, the application for approval was successful.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.