e2o Pty Ltd
Case
•
[2019] FWC 1145
•27 FEBRUARY 2019
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
e2o Pty Ltd [2019] FWC 1145
[2019] FWC 1145
27 FEBRUARY 2019
CaseChat Overview and Summary
In the matter of e2o Pty Ltd, the Fair Work Commission was tasked with considering the approval of the Enterprise Agreement proposed for the period 2018-2022. The applicant, e2o Pty Ltd, sought the Commission's approval of the agreement, which had been negotiated between the company and its employees represented by a union. The primary dispute centred around the terms and conditions outlined in the agreement, including pay rates, working conditions, and other employment-related matters.
The legal issues that the Commission had to address involved determining whether the agreement complied with the relevant statutory requirements under the Fair Work Act 2009. Specifically, the Commission needed to ensure that the agreement did not adversely affect employees' terms and conditions of employment, and that it was made in good faith and covered the appropriate bargaining unit. The Commission also had to consider whether the agreement met the 'better off overall test', which required that the employees were not worse off financially as a result of the agreement.
The Commission considered the evidence provided by both parties, including submissions and expert testimony. The Commission found that the agreement did not unjustifiably harden existing terms and conditions of employment and that it was made in good faith. The Commission also found that the agreement met the 'better off overall test'. Consequently, the Commission approved the Enterprise Agreement for the period 2018-2022, subject to the specific terms and conditions outlined in the agreement. The decision was made on the basis that the agreement was fair and reasonable, and did not negatively impact the employees' terms and conditions of employment.
The legal issues that the Commission had to address involved determining whether the agreement complied with the relevant statutory requirements under the Fair Work Act 2009. Specifically, the Commission needed to ensure that the agreement did not adversely affect employees' terms and conditions of employment, and that it was made in good faith and covered the appropriate bargaining unit. The Commission also had to consider whether the agreement met the 'better off overall test', which required that the employees were not worse off financially as a result of the agreement.
The Commission considered the evidence provided by both parties, including submissions and expert testimony. The Commission found that the agreement did not unjustifiably harden existing terms and conditions of employment and that it was made in good faith. The Commission also found that the agreement met the 'better off overall test'. Consequently, the Commission approved the Enterprise Agreement for the period 2018-2022, subject to the specific terms and conditions outlined in the agreement. The decision was made on the basis that the agreement was fair and reasonable, and did not negatively impact the employees' terms and conditions of employment.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Employment & Labour Law
Legal Concepts
-
Collective Agreement
-
Approval of Enterprise Agreement
-
Fair Work Act
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Citations
e2o Pty Ltd [2019] FWC 1145
Most Recent Citation
Application by Boom Logistics Projects Pty Ltd [2025] FWC 684
Cases Citing This Decision
8
Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia v e2o Pty Ltd
[2019] FWCFB 4023
Application by Boom Logistics Projects Pty Ltd
[2025] FWC 684
Svitzer Growth Projects Pty Ltd
[2023] FWCA 3069
Cases Cited
6
Statutory Material Cited
0
Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union v Ron Southon Pty Ltd
[2016] FWCFB 8413
Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union v Collinsville Coal Operations Pty Limited
[2014] FWCFB 7940
United Voice v Sodexo Australia Pty Ltd T/A Sodexo Australia
[2016] FWCFB 8531