| [2016] FWCA 4223 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement
E.B Mawson & Sons Pty Ltd T/A Mawsons
(AG2016/1216)
E.B. MAWSON & SONS AND AWU QUARRIES AND MOBILE ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2016-2018
Quarrying industry | |
COMMISSIONER LEE | MELBOURNE, 29 JUNE 2016 |
Application for approval of the E.B. Mawson & Sons and AWU Quarries and Mobile Enterprise Agreement 2016-2018.
[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the E.B. Mawson & Sons and AWU Quarries and Mobile Enterprise Agreement 2016-2018 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by E.B Mawson & Sons Pty Ltd T/A Mawsons. The Agreement is a single enterprise agreement.
[2] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.
[3] The Australian Workers’ Union being a bargaining representative for the Agreement, has given notice under s.183 of the Act that it wants the Agreement to cover it. In accordance with s.201(2) I note that the Agreement covers the organisation.
[4] The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from 6 July 2016. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 30 June 2018.
COMMISSIONER
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code G, AE419603 PR582130>
- AGLC
- E.B Mawson & Sons Pty Ltd T/A Mawsons [2016] FWCA 4223
- Case
- [2016] FWCA 4223
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The legal issues before the Commission were whether the agreement complied with the requirements of the Fair Work Act and whether it was made in good faith. The Commission considered whether the agreement was a "direct" agreement between the employer and the employees, and whether it met the criteria for "better off overall and in the round" (BOOT) as required by the Act. The Commission also needed to determine if the agreement included provisions for dispute resolution and whether it was free from any unfair provisions.
The Commission found that the agreement was a direct agreement and that it complied with the requirements of the Act. The agreement provided for dispute resolution and contained provisions that were fair and reasonable. The Commission concluded that the agreement was made in good faith and that it was BOOT for the employees. The Commission approved the Enterprise Agreement, subject to the parties lodging a certified copy of the agreement within 28 days of the decision.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.