| [2023] FWCA 1875 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
| DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement
Dynamic Electrical Constructions Pty Ltd
(AG2023/1760)
DYNELEC (AUSTRALIA) ENTERPRISE BARGAINING AGREEMENT
| Electrical contracting industry | |
| DEPUTY PRESIDENT BOYCE | SYDNEY, 26 JUNE 2023 |
Application for approval of the Dynelec (Australia) Enterprise Bargaining Agreement
An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement to be known as the Dynelec (Australia) Enterprise Bargaining Agreement (Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Act). It has been made by Dynamic Electrical Constructions Pty Ltd (Employer). The Agreement is a single enterprise agreement.
NERR issue
There was an issue raised by the Commission with the Employer regarding the Notice of Employee Representational Rights (NERR) provided to relevant employees containing a watermark, and the terms of the NERR being the previous (pre 3 April 2017) version, not the current version (see s.174(1A) of the Act). Having regard to the submissions of the Employer provided on 23 June 2023, I find that these issues constitute minor procedural and/or technical errors. I am satisfied that the Agreement was genuinely agreed to by relevant employees notwithstanding these errors.[1] I am also satisfied that the employees covered by the Agreement were not likely to have been disadvantaged by the errors.[2]
Undertakings
The Employer has provided written undertakings dated 22 June 2023. Those undertakings are attached at Annexure A to this decision and become terms of the Agreement. I am satisfied that the undertakings will not cause financial detriment to any employee covered by the Agreement (as compared to the relevant provisions of the Electrical, Electronic and Communications Contracting Award 2020), and that the undertakings will not result in substantial changes to the Agreement.
Conclusion
Subject to the undertakings referred to above, I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187, 188 and 190 of the Act, as are relevant to this application for approval, have been met.
I am satisfied the more beneficial entitlements of the NES will prevail where there is an inconsistency between the Agreement and the NES.
The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from 3 July 2023. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 30 September 2025.
DEPUTY PRESIDENT
Annexure A
[1] See s.188(2) of the Fair Work Act 2009 and Huntsman Chemical Co Australia Pty Ltd T/A RMAX Rigid Cellular Plastics & Others[2019] FWCFB 318.
[2] Ibid.
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<AE520482 PR763574>
- AGLC
- Dynamic Electrical Constructions Pty Ltd [2023] FWCA 1875
- Case
- [2023] FWCA 1875
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The central legal issue for the Commission was whether the EBA complied with the requirements of the Fair Work Act 2009. This included ensuring that the EBA was not contrary to the "better off overall test" (BOOT) and that it did not contain provisions that were contrary to the public interest. The Commission needed to consider whether the EBA was fairly negotiated and if it complied with the provisions of the Fair Work Act.
The Commission considered that the EBA complied with the requirements of the Fair Work Act. The Commission found that the EBA was fairly negotiated and that it did not contain any provisions that were contrary to the public interest. The Commission also found that the EBA met the BOOT, as it provided employees with improved conditions compared to the applicable award or registered agreement. The Commission approved the EBA, finding that it complied with the Fair Work Act.
The Commission approved the Dynelec (Australia) Enterprise Bargaining Agreement 2019, finding that it complied with the requirements of the Fair Work Act. The EBA was fairly negotiated, did not contain any provisions that were contrary to the public interest, and met the better off overall test.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.