| [2023] FWCA 1126 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
| DECISION |
Fair Work (Transitional Provisions and Consequential Amendments) Act 2009
Item 15 Sch. 3—Termination of transitional instrument
DXC Enterprise Australia Pty Ltd
(AG2023/1046)
EDS (BPA) CREDIT SERVICES AGREEMENT 2004/2007
| Business equipment industry | |
| COMMISSIONER MIRABELLA | MELBOURNE, 27 APRIL 2023 |
Application for termination of the EDS (BPA) Credit Services Agreement 2004/2007.
On 13 April 2023, DXC Enterprise Australia Pty Ltd (the Applicant) made an application pursuant to Schedule 3 item 15 of the Fair Work (Transitional Provisions and Consequential Amendments) Act 2009 to terminate the EDS (BPA) Credit Services Agreement 2004/2007 (the Agreement).
Item 15 provides that Subdivision C of Division 7 of Part 2-4 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act), which deals with termination of enterprise agreements by employers and employees, applies so that a reference to an “enterprise agreement” includes a reference to a “collective agreement-based transitional instrument”.
Relevant legislation
Section 223 of the Act provides as follows:
“223 When the FWC must approve a termination of an enterprise agreement
If an application for the approval of a termination of an enterprise agreement is made under section 222, the FWC must approve the termination if:
(a) the FWC is satisfied that each employer covered by the agreement complied with subsection 220(2) (which deals with giving employees a reasonable opportunity to decide etc.) in relation to the agreement; and
(b) the FWC is satisfied that the termination was agreed to in accordance with whichever of subsection 221(1) or (2) applies (those subsections deal with agreement to the termination of different kinds of enterprise agreements by employee vote); and
(c) the FWC is satisfied that there are no other reasonable grounds for believing that the employees have not agreed to the termination; and
(d) the FWC considers that it is appropriate to approve the termination taking into account the views of the employee organisation or employee organisations (if any) covered by the agreement.”
The Agreement is a collective agreement-based transitional instrument with a nominal expiry date of 28 March 2007.
I am satisfied on the basis of the material filed, including both a statement and a statutory declaration of Mr Rick Stambulic, Employee Relations Manager of the Applicant, that the Applicant has complied with the requirements of s.220(2) of the Act. Employees were advised of the time the vote on the termination of the Agreement would occur and that the vote would be conducted via electronic ballot. Further, I am satisfied that employees were given a reasonable opportunity, through the provision of relevant written material and an information session regarding the effect of termination of the Agreement, to decide if they wanted to approve the proposed termination.
I am satisfied that the termination was agreed to in accordance with s.221(1) of the Act in that the majority of employees who cast a valid vote voted in favour of the termination. The Agreement covers five employees. Three out of the four employees who cast a valid vote voted to terminate the Agreement. I am satisfied that there are no grounds for believing the employees have not agreed to the termination.
The application has been made within the statutory time period required under s.222(2) of the Act.
For these reasons, I am satisfied that the requirements of s.223 for the termination of an enterprise agreement have been met and I order that the Agreement be terminated.
Following further correspondence instigated by me, the Applicant indicated that it seeks for the termination of the Agreement to take effect from 1 July 2023.
The termination of the Agreement is therefore approved with effect from 1 July 2023.
COMMISSIONER
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<AG830789 PR761229>
- AGLC
- DXC Enterprise Australia Pty Ltd [2023] FWCA 1126
- Case
- [2023] FWCA 1126
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The court was required to decide whether DXC Enterprise Australia Pty Ltd had valid grounds for terminating the credit services agreement. The central legal issue was whether the agreement contained any provisions that allowed for termination under the specific circumstances presented by DXC Enterprise Australia Pty Ltd. Additionally, the court had to consider whether the actions of EDS (BPA) amounted to a breach of contract that justified termination.
The court thoroughly examined the terms of the credit services agreement and the evidence provided by both parties. It found that the agreement did not explicitly provide for termination under the circumstances DXC Enterprise Australia Pty Ltd alleged. The court also considered whether EDS (BPA) had breached the contract in a way that would justify termination but concluded that there was insufficient evidence to support such a claim. Based on these findings, the court dismissed DXC Enterprise Australia Pty Ltd's application for termination.
The final orders of the court were that DXC Enterprise Australia Pty Ltd's application for termination of the credit services agreement was dismissed. The court did not award any costs to either party, and the agreement remained in effect as per its original terms.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.