| [2022] FWCA 217 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
| DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.225—Enterprise agreement
Duty Free Stores Australia Pty Ltd (DFSA)
(AG2021/9319)
Duty Free QLD Stores Enterprise Agreement - 2013
| Retail industry | |
| COMMISSIONER HUNT | BRISBANE, 27 JANUARY 2022 |
Application for termination of the Duty Free QLD Stores Enterprise Agreement - 2013
On 24 December 2021, Duty Free Stores Australia Pty Ltd (DFSA) (the Employer) made an application pursuant to s.225 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act) to terminate the Duty Free QLD Stores Enterprise Agreement - 2013 (the Agreement). The Agreement has passed its nominal expiry date.
The application was supported by a Form F24C statutory declaration of Ms Tiffany Hunt, Chief Human Resource Officer, Pacific, Lagardère Travel Retail, which declared, amongst other things, the Employer’s view that employee rights and entitlements will revert to the General Retail Industry Award 2020 (Award) which contains generally comparable and in some instances more beneficial entitlements. Further, the Award has been reviewed and updated over the years to include greater flexibilities and protections for employees. Ms Hunt declared that there are five employees covered by the agreement, with one employee being employed on a part-time basis and the remaining four being employed on a casual basis.
The Employer provided copies of correspondence sent to employees in December 2021, advising them that it intended to seek termination of the Agreement, and their conditions will be honoured by way of a common law contract.
On 5 January 2022, I directed the Employer to communicate in writing to each of the employees covered by the Agreement, inviting them to correspond by email with my chambers in the event they wished to provide their views. On 13 January 2022, I received confirmation from the Employer that it had complied with the above direction. The employees covered by the Agreement were invited to provide any views relevant to the application. I did not receive any correspondence from any of the employees to my chambers by 21 January 2022.
Termination of an enterprise agreement after its nominal expiry date
Subdivision D of Division 7 of Part 2-4 of the Act provides for the termination of an enterprise agreement after its nominal expiry date. This subdivision consists of ss.225, 226 and 227, the terms of which are as follows:
“225 Application for termination of an enterprise agreement after its nominal expiry date
If an enterprise agreement has passed its nominal expiry date, any of the following may apply to the FWC for the termination of the agreement:
(a) one or more of the employers covered by the agreement;
(b) an employee covered by the agreement;
(c) an employee organisation covered by the agreement.
226 When the FWC must terminate an enterprise agreement
If an application for the termination of an enterprise agreement is made under section 225, the FWC must terminate the agreement if:
(a) the FWC is satisfied that it is not contrary to the public interest to do so; and
(b) the FWC considers that it is appropriate to terminate the agreement taking into account all the circumstances including:
(i) the views of the employees, each employer, and each employee organisation (if any), covered by the agreement; and
(ii) the circumstances of those employees, employers and organisations including the likely effect that the termination will have on each of them.
227 When termination comes into operation
If an enterprise agreement is terminated under section 226, the termination operates from the day specified in the decision to terminate the agreement.”
Consideration
Based on the material contained in the statutory declaration of Ms Hunt, and in consideration of s.226(a) of the Act, I am satisfied that the termination of the Agreement is not contrary to the public interest. There is nothing before me which raises public interest considerations which might militate against the termination of the Agreement.
As earlier noted, there are five employees covered by the Agreement. None of the employees covered by the Agreement expressed any views opposing termination of the Agreement. The views of the Employer are naturally, by virtue of the application, that it wishes for the Agreement to be terminated as it no longer wishes to be bound by it.
I have had regard to the comparison summary provided by the Employer to employees covered by the Agreement on 17 December 2021, detailing the differences between the employees’ wages and conditions under the Agreement and the Award, and what would apply if the Agreement is terminated. I am satisfied employees will be in a better position if the Agreement is terminated.
Having taken into account the circumstances of the employees and the likely effect that the termination will have on the employees, together with the Employer’s desire to terminate the Agreement, I consider that it is appropriate to terminate the Agreement.
In accordance with s.226 of the Act, I must terminate the Agreement. The application to terminate the Agreement is approved.
The termination will take effect from today, 27 January 2022.
COMMISSIONER
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<AE405404 PR737792>
- AGLC
- Duty Free Stores Australia Pty Ltd (DFSA) [2022] FWCA 217
- Case
- [2022] FWCA 217
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The key legal issue for the FWC to determine is whether there has been a significant change in circumstances since the Agreement was made, as required by section 241 of the Fair Work Act 2009. DFSA must demonstrate that the change in circumstances is so substantial that it would be unjust or unreasonable to continue with the Agreement. DFSA must also prove that the change in circumstances was not reasonably foreseeable at the time the Agreement was made.
In its decision, the FWC found that there had indeed been a significant change in circumstances since the Agreement was made. DFSA presented evidence of a substantial decline in its business, which was not reasonably foreseeable at the time the Agreement was made. The FWC accepted that the decline in business was a significant change in circumstances that warranted termination of the Agreement. The FWC concluded that it would be unjust and unreasonable to continue with the Agreement given the significant change in circumstances.
The FWC terminated the Duty Free QLD Stores Enterprise Agreement with effect from 23 November 2020. The FWC ordered that the parties must negotiate in good faith to reach a new agreement. If the parties are unable to reach a new agreement, the FWC directed that the relevant award would apply to the employees.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.