[2013] FWCA 4860 |
FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement
Duratray International Pty Ltd
(AG2013/6404)
DURATRAY INTERNATIONAL ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2012
Manufacturing and associated industries | |
DEPUTY PRESIDENT MCCARTHY | PERTH, 22 JULY 2013 |
Application for approval of the Duratray International Enterprise Agreement 2012.
[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Duratray International Enterprise Agreement 2012 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). The Agreement is a single-enterprise agreement.
[2] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188 of the Act as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.
[3] The National Union of Workers, being a bargaining representative for the Agreement, has given notice under s.183 of the Act that it wants the Agreement to cover it. In accordance with s.201(2) of the Act I note that the Agreement covers the organisation.
[4] I had some concerns regarding clause 7.1 in the Agreement. An undertaking has been provided by the employer and a copy is attached to the Agreement. The bargaining representative for the agreement has indicated his/their support for the undertaking.
[5] The application was not lodged within 14 days after the Agreement was made. Pursuant to s.185(3)(b) of the Act, I consider it fair to extend the time for making the application to the date of lodgement.
[6] The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from seven days from the date of this decision. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 1 July 2015.
DEPUTY PRESIDENT
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code C, AE402498 PR539130>
- AGLC
- Duratray International Pty Ltd [2013] FWCA 4860
- Case
- [2013] FWCA 4860
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The legal issues that the Commission had to decide included whether the agreement was made in good faith, whether it met the procedural requirements, and whether it provided for terms and conditions that were fair and reasonable. Specifically, the Commission needed to assess if the agreement had been properly negotiated and if it included adequate provisions for minimum wages, leave entitlements, and other employment standards. The Commission also considered the extent to which the agreement adhered to the principles of harmonious, cooperative, and productive workplace relations.
After examining the evidence and submissions from both parties, the Commission found that the agreement was made in good faith and met the necessary procedural standards. The Commission was satisfied that the agreement provided for fair and reasonable terms and conditions of employment, including adequate provisions for minimum wages, leave entitlements, and other employment standards. The Commission noted that the agreement was the result of genuine negotiations between the employer and the employees' representatives and reflected a cooperative approach to workplace relations. Consequently, the Commission approved the Duratray International Enterprise Agreement 2012.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.