Dunnet v Brennan

The appeal in *Dunnet v Brennan* concerned a dispute arising from alleged negligence. The appellant, Mr. Dunnet, appealed a decision of the trial judge concerning damages awarded to the respondent, Ms. Brennan. The central factual scenario involved Mr. Dunnet continuing to drive a vehicle with Ms. Brennan on its roof.

The Court of Appeal was required to determine whether the trial judge had erred in finding Mr. Dunnet negligent, and specifically, whether the apportionment of contributory negligence was too low. Furthermore, the court considered whether the quantum of damages awarded for non-economic loss, economic loss, future economic loss, and future care was excessive.

The Court of Appeal dismissed the appeal. While the specific reasoning of the judges is not detailed in the provided text, the outcome indicates that the court found no error in the trial judge's findings regarding negligence, contributory negligence, or the assessment of damages. The appeal was dismissed with costs awarded to the respondent.