Dun v Dun

The case of *Dun v Dun* concerned an application for an extension of time to bring a Family Provision Act claim. The applicant sought to bring a claim against the estate of the deceased, her father, but had failed to do so within the statutory time limit.

The primary legal issue before the court was whether the applicant had established sufficient grounds to warrant an extension of time for her Family Provision Act claim. This required the court to consider the principles governing the exercise of discretion to grant such extensions, including the reasons for the delay and the potential prejudice to the beneficiaries of the estate.

The court's reasoning focused on the established principles for granting extensions of time under the relevant legislation. It considered the applicant's explanation for the delay, which included personal difficulties and a lack of awareness of her rights. The court also weighed the potential impact on the beneficiaries, noting that the estate had not yet been fully distributed. Ultimately, the court found that the applicant had demonstrated a sufficient case to justify an extension of time, balancing the applicant's need for provision against the interests of the beneficiaries.