Dudzinski v Kellow & Ors

The applicant, Dudzinski, sought to appeal against a decision of the Supreme Court of New South Wales. The respondents were Kellow and others. The precise nature of the dispute that led to the Supreme Court's decision is not detailed in the provided text, but the application before Heydon J concerned an application for leave to appeal.

The central legal issue before Heydon J was whether the applicant had demonstrated sufficient grounds to be granted leave to appeal against the Supreme Court's prior determination. This involved an assessment of whether there was a reasonably arguable case of error in the original decision.

Heydon J considered the applicant's arguments and the relevant legal principles governing applications for leave to appeal. His Honour concluded that the applicant had not established a sufficient basis for leave to appeal, finding that the grounds raised were not reasonably arguable. Consequently, the application for leave to appeal was dismissed.