Dromore Properties Pty Ltd v Byron Shire Council

Case [2018] NSWLEC 1324


Land and Environment Court


New South Wales

Medium Neutral Citation: Dromore Properties Pty Ltd v Byron Shire Council [2018] NSWLEC 1324
Hearing dates: Conciliation conference on 29 June 2018
Date of orders: 29 June 2018
Decision date: 29 June 2018
Jurisdiction:Class 1
Before: Dickson C
Decision:

See [5] below

Catchwords: DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION: conciliation conference; agreement between the parties; orders
Legislation Cited: Land and Environment Court Act 1979
Category:Principal judgment
Parties: Dromore Properties Pty Ltd (Applicant)
Byron Shire Council (Respondent)
Representation: Solicitors:
M Young, McCartney Young Lawyers (Applicant)
C Rose, Swaab Attorneys (Respondent)
File Number(s): 2018/72546
Publication restriction: No

Judgment

  1. COMMISSIONER: This is an appeal by Dromore Properties Pty Ltd against the deemed refusal by Byron Shire Council of the construction of multi-dwelling housing comprising three (3) dwellings, alterations and additions to an existing dwelling and strata subdivision to create two (2) strata lots including a vacant development lot at 57 Carlyle Street, Byron Bay.

  2. In this matter, at or after a conciliation conference, an agreement under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 (the Court Act) was reached between the parties as to the terms of a decision in the proceedings that was acceptable to the parties. As the presiding Commissioner, I was satisfied that the decision was one that the Court could have made in the proper exercise of its functions (this being the test applied by s 34(3) of the Court Act. As a consequence, s 34(3)(a) of the Act required me to “dispose of the proceedings in accordance with the decision”.

  3. The Court Act also required me to “set out in writing the terms of the decision” (s 34(3)(b)). The orders made to give effect to the agreement constitute that document.

  4. In making the orders to give effect to the agreement between the parties, I was not required to make, and have not made, any merit assessment of the issues that were originally in dispute between the parties.

  5. The final orders to give effect to the parties’ agreement under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 are:

  1. The Applicant is granted leave to rely upon the plan, a copy of which is at Annexure 'A':

Plan No.

Description

Prepared by

Dated:

DA.02 / D

Proposed Works + Subdivision Plan

Those Architects

7/5/18

  1. The appeal is upheld.

  2. The Applicant is to pay the Respondent's costs under section 8.15(3) of the Environmental Planning Assessment Act 1979 agreed in the sum of $4,000 and payable within 28 days of the date of orders being made by the Court.

  3. Development Application No. 10.2017.686.1 for alterations to an existing dwelling house and the subdivision of two lots to create two strata lots at Lot 14 Sec 30 DP 758207 and Lot 2 DP 401710 known as 57 Carlyle Street, Byron Bay be approved, subject to the conditions in Annexure 'B'.

……………………….

D M Dickson

Commissioner of the Court

Annexure A (1.46 MB, pdf)

Annexure B (108 KB, pdf)

Details
AGLC
Dromore Properties Pty Ltd v Byron Shire Council [2018] NSWLEC 1324
Case
[2018] NSWLEC 1324
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In Dromore Properties Pty Ltd v Byron Shire Council, the plaintiff, Dromore Properties, sought judicial review of a decision by the Byron Shire Council, which had refused their application to subdivide a parcel of land. The case was heard in the Land and Environment Court of New South Wales. The central issue before the court was whether the council's refusal to grant a consent to subdivide was lawful, and if the council had acted irrationally or irrationally in the process.

The court was tasked with determining the proper application of the relevant statutory provisions and whether the council had adhered to the principles of administrative law, particularly in relation to procedural fairness and the consideration of relevant matters. The primary legal issue was whether the council had applied its mind to the statutory criteria for granting consent and whether the refusal was based on evidence and relevant considerations. The court examined the statutory framework under the Local Government Act 1993 (NSW), focusing on the criteria that the council must consider in deciding applications for subdivision.

The court found that the council had failed to properly consider the statutory criteria and had acted without proper application of mind. It was held that the council's refusal was not based on evidence and relevant considerations. The court concluded that the council's decision was not rational and had not been made in accordance with the law. Consequently, the court quashed the council's decision and remitted the matter for reconsideration, directing the council to properly apply its mind to the statutory criteria. The orders included a declaration that the council's decision was invalid, and the matter was remitted to the council for reconsideration in accordance with the court's directions.

Orders

Orders of the court

See [5] below

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.