Drasha and Gani

In the matter of *Drasha and Gani*, heard by Tree J, the dispute concerned applications made by both the husband and wife. The wife sought orders in relation to her Amended Application in a Case filed on 29 August 2017, and the husband filed a Response to an Application in a Case on 7 September 2017. The court also considered the husband’s Application filed on 30 January 2017, and the wife’s Application in a Case filed on 15 August 2017.

The primary legal issues before the court were the determination of the applications filed by the parties and the appropriate orders regarding costs. Specifically, the court was required to decide whether to dismiss the substantive applications made by both the husband and the wife, and to consider the basis upon which costs should be awarded.

Tree J ordered that the husband pay the wife’s costs of and incidental to his Application filed 30 January 2017, and the wife’s Application in a Case filed 15 August 2017, on an indemnity basis. The court further ordered that, otherwise, the wife’s Amended Application in a Case filed 29 August 2017, and the husband’s Response to an Application in a Case filed 7 September 2017, be dismissed. These orders were subject to the entry of the order in the Court’s records.