| [2015] FWCA 1672 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185 - Application for approval of a single-enterprise agreement
Drake Australia Pty Ltd
(AG2015/445)
DRAKE AUSTRALIA PTY LTD ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT (QUEENSLAND) 2015
Storage services | |
COMMISSIONER ROE | MELBOURNE, 12 MARCH 2015 |
Application for approval of the Drake Australia Pty Ltd Enterprise Agreement (Queensland) 2015.
[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Drake Australia Pty Ltd Enterprise Agreement (Queensland) 2015 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by Drake Australia Pty Ltd (the Applicant). The agreement is a single-enterprise agreement.
[2] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188 of the Act as are relevant to this application for approval have been met. The Agreement does not cover all of the employees of the employer however taking into account the factors in Section 186(3) and (3A) I am satisfied that the group of employees was fairly chosen.
[3] The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from 19 March 2015. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 18 March 2019.
COMMISSIONER
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code C, AE412987 PR561865>
- AGLC
- Drake Australia Pty Ltd [2015] FWCA 1672
- Case
- [2015] FWCA 1672
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The court examined the fairness and content of the proposed agreement, considering whether it provided for appropriate terms and conditions of employment, including minimum rates of pay, leave entitlements, and other employment benefits. The court also assessed whether the agreement had been negotiated in good faith and whether it complied with the procedural requirements for enterprise agreements. The court's analysis involved a detailed review of the negotiation process and the provisions of the agreement to ensure they met the statutory criteria. Ultimately, the court found that the agreement was consistent with the requirements of the Act, and it approved the enterprise agreement.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.