| [2024] FWCA 1354 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
| DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement
DP World Sydney Limited
(AG2024/1057)
DP WORLD SYDNEY ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2024
| Stevedoring industry | |
| COMMISSIONER MATHESON | SYDNEY, 16 APRIL 2024 |
Application for approval of the DP World Sydney Enterprise Agreement 2024
An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the DP World Sydney Enterprise Agreement 2024 (Agreement). The application was made by DP World Sydney Limited (Applicant) pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) (Act). The Agreement is a single enterprise agreement.
Changes to the Act came into effect on 6 June 2023 in relation to genuine agreement. The Form F17A indicates that the notification time for the Agreement was 31 March 2023. In these circumstances and as a consequence of the Fair Work Legislation Amendment (Secure Jobs, Better Pay) Act 2022 (Amending Act), clause 66 of Part 13 of Schedule 1 of the Act has the effect that despite the amendments made to the Act by Part 14 of Schedule 1 to the Amending Act, Part 2-4 of the Act continues to apply as if the amendments had not been made. The application has been assessed on this basis, taking into account the provisions of Part 2-4 of the Act in relation to genuine agreement in force immediately prior to 6 June 2023.
I observe that certain provisions of the Agreement may be inconsistent with the National Employment Standards (NES). However, noting clause 5.3 of the Agreement, I am satisfied that the more beneficial entitlements of the NES will prevail where there is an inconsistency between the Agreement and the NES.
Pursuant to s.202(4) of the Act, the model flexibility term prescribed by the Fair Work Regulations 2009 (Cth) (Regulations) is taken to be a term of the Agreement.
Pursuant to s.205(2) of the Act, the model consultation term prescribed by the Fair Work Regulations 2009 (Cth) (Regulations) is taken to be a term of the Agreement.
On the basis of the materials before the Commission, I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188 of the Act as are relevant to the application for approval of the Agreement have been met.
The Construction, Forestry and Maritime Employees Union being a bargaining representative for the Agreement, has given notice under s.183 of the Act that it wants the Agreement to cover it. In accordance with s.201(2) of the Act, I note that the Agreement covers the organisation.
The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from 23 April 2024. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 31 January 2028.
COMMISSIONER
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<AE524232 PR773577>
- AGLC
- DP World Sydney Limited [2024] FWCA 1354
- Case
- [2024] FWCA 1354
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The legal issues before the Commission included whether the proposed agreement met the "better off overall test" and if it provided for a fair and reasonable terms of employment. The Commission had to consider the financial impact of the proposed agreement on the employees, as well as the bargaining positions of both parties and any relevant public interest considerations. Additionally, the Commission assessed whether the agreement adhered to the principles of good faith bargaining and whether it provided for adequate mechanisms for dispute resolution.
The Commission found that the proposed agreement met the better off overall test and was fair and reasonable for the employees. The Commission noted that the agreement provided for a modest increase in wages and included provisions for improved working conditions. The Commission also considered the bargaining positions of the parties and found that the agreement was the product of genuine good faith bargaining. After weighing all relevant factors, the Commission approved the DP World Sydney Enterprise Agreement 2024.
The Fair Work Commission approved the DP World Sydney Enterprise Agreement 2024, finding that it was fair and reasonable for the employees. The Commission's decision recognised the modest wage increases and improved working conditions provided for in the agreement. The Commission also noted that the agreement was the product of genuine good faith bargaining between the parties. The approval of the agreement ensures that the terms and conditions of employment for the employees covered by the agreement are regulated by the approved agreement.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.