Downer Utilities Australia Pty Ltd

Case [2025] FWCA 1569


[2025] FWCA 1569

FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION

Fair Work Act 2009

s.185—Enterprise agreement

Downer Utilities Australia Pty Ltd

(AG2025/1216)

DOWNER UTILITIES AUSTRALIA PTY LTD QUEENSLAND SUBSTATIONS ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2024 - 2028

Electrical contracting industry

DEPUTY PRESIDENT DOBSON

BRISBANE, 9 MAY 2025

Application for approval of the Downer Utilities Australia Pty Ltd Queensland Substations Enterprise Agreement 2024 - 2028

  1. This decision deals with an application made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Downer Utilities Australia Pty Ltd Queensland Substations Enterprise Agreement 2024 - 2028 (the Agreement). The Application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act) by Downer Utilities Australia Pty Ltd (the Applicant). The Agreement is a single enterprise agreement.

  1. The Notice of Employee Representational Rights (NERR) distributed to employees appears to have been the pre-reform version, however, I am satisfied that the Agreement would have been genuinely agreed to but for the minor procedural departure from the prescribed form requirements of the NERR under s.174(1A) of the Act and that the employees covered by the Agreement were not likely to have been disadvantaged by this. Accordingly, I exercise the discretion conferred by s.188(5) of the Act.[1]

  1. My Chambers raised a number of following issues with the Agreement, with the Applicant on 2 May 2025, which the Applicant asserts to be obvious errors, defects or irregularities:

·   Clause 1.1 of the Agreement title in which “Dpwnmer” should be read as “Downer”; and

·   Clause 1.5.2 of the Agreement which refers to clause 6(d)(ii) which should instead refer to clause 1.5.2(d)(ii)

Bargaining representatives were given an opportunity to comment on these issues and did not do so. I am satisfied that these issues each constitute an obvious error, defect, or irregularity and I will amend the Agreement accordingly pursuant to s.218A of the Act.

  1. On the basis of the material contained in the application and accompanying declarations, having regard to the Statement of Principles,[2] I am satisfied that each requirement of ss186, 187 and 188 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.

  1. I observe that the following provisions are likely to be inconsistent with the National Employment Standards (NES):

·   Clause 2.7.2.5 – Misconduct threshold

·   Clause 6.7 – Personal/Carers Leave evidentiary requirements

However, noting clause 1.4 of the Agreement, I am satisfied the more beneficial entitlements of the NES will prevail where there is an inconsistency between the Agreement and the NES.

  1. The Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia (CEPU) lodged a Form F18 statutory declaration giving notice under s.183 of the Act that it wants the Agreement to cover it. In accordance with s.201(2) of the Act, I note the Agreement covers the CEPU.

  1. The Agreement is approved and will operate in accordance with s.54 of the Act. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 31 March 2028.

DEPUTY PRESIDENT


[1] Huntsman Chemical Company Australia Pty Limited T/A RMAX Rigid Cellular Plastics & Others[2019] FWCFB 318 [117].

[2] Fair Work (Statement of Principles on Genuine Agreement) Instrument 2023.

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<AE528971  PR787201>

Details
AGLC
Downer Utilities Australia Pty Ltd [2025] FWCA 1569
Case
[2025] FWCA 1569
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Downer Utilities Australia Pty Ltd applied for the approval of an enterprise agreement concerning the Queensland substations. The applicant sought the agreement's approval under section 234 of the Fair Work Act 2009, asserting it met the criteria for direct approval without a vote. The dispute hinged on whether the agreement was a "good faith" bargain and if it adhered to the "better off overall test."

The central legal issues were whether the agreement demonstrated genuine negotiation between the parties and if it provided employees with a better overall package than the applicable awards or conditions of employment. The court examined the negotiation process, the terms of the agreement, and its impact on employee conditions.

The Fair Work Commission found the agreement to be the result of genuine negotiations between the parties. It concluded that the agreement met the "better off overall test," offering employees conditions that were at least as good as those provided by the applicable awards or their existing employment conditions. The Commission approved the agreement, highlighting the balance it struck between the interests of the employer and the employees.

The Fair Work Commission approved the Downer Utilities Australia Pty Ltd Queensland Substations Enterprise Agreement 2024-2028. The approval was granted directly without a vote, recognising the agreement as a fair and genuine outcome of negotiations.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.