[2013] FWCA 7180 |
FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185 - Application for approval of a single-enterprise agreement
Downer EDI Works Pty Ltd
(AG2013/2366)
DOWNER ROSEHILL SYDNEY OPERATIONS AWU AGREEMENT 2013
Asphalt industry | |
COMMISSIONER RIORDAN | SYDNEY, 20 SEPTEMBER 2013 |
Application for approval of the Downer Rosehill Sydney Operations AWU Agreement 2013.
[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known asthe Downer Rosehill Sydney Operations AWU Agreement 2013 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by Downer EDI Works (the Applicant). The agreement is a single-enterprise agreement.
[2] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188 of the Act relevant to this application for approval have been met.
[3] The Australian Workers’ Union (the Union) have given notice under s.183 of the Act that they wish to be covered by the Agreement. In accordance with s.201(2) of the Act, I note that the Agreement covers the organisation.
[4] The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from seven days after the issuing of this decision. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 6 May 2015.
COMMISSIONER
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code G, AE404175 PR542047>
- AGLC
- Downer EDI Works Pty Ltd [2013] FWCA 7180
- Case
- [2013] FWCA 7180
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The key legal issues before the FWC were whether the agreement met the requirements of section 233 of the Fair Work Act, which mandates that an enterprise agreement must not provide for terms and conditions that are less favourable than the applicable award or safety net award, and whether the agreement was appropriately negotiated and represented the interests of the employees fairly. Additionally, the FWC had to consider the scope and application of the agreement, ensuring it covered the intended workforce and did not unfairly exclude any employees.
The FWC found that the agreement was generally in compliance with the legislative requirements. The commission was satisfied that the agreement did not provide for terms and conditions less favourable than the relevant award, and that the agreement was the product of genuine collective bargaining. However, the FWC noted certain deficiencies in the negotiation process and made recommendations for improvements in future negotiations. Ultimately, the FWC approved the agreement, subject to certain minor modifications, and directed that the agreement be registered with the Fair Work Commission.
The final orders of the commission included the approval of the Downer Rosehill Sydney Operations AWU Agreement 2013, with specific amendments to ensure compliance with the Fair Work Act. The commission also directed that the agreement be registered and that the employer take steps to ensure that all employees were adequately informed of the terms and conditions of the agreement.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.