| [2017] FWCA 5025 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement
Downer EDI Works Pty Ltd
(AG2017/4094)
DOWNER INFRASTRUCTURE (HUME/ACT) & CFMEU AGREEMENT 2017
Asphalt industry | |
DEPUTY PRESIDENT GOSTENCNIK | PERTH, 27 SEPTEMBER 2017 |
Application for approval of the Downer Infrastructure (Hume/ACT) & CFMEU Agreement 2017.
[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Downer Infrastructure (Hume/ACT) & CFMEU Agreement 2017 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by Downer EDI Works Pty Ltd. The agreement is a single enterprise agreement.
[2] The Applicant has provided written undertakings. A copy of the undertakings is attached in Annexure A. I am satisfied that the undertakings will not cause financial detriment to any employee covered by the Agreement and that the undertakings will not result in substantial changes to the Agreement.
[3] Subject to the undertakings referred to above, and on the basis of the material contained in the application and accompanying statutory declaration, I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187, 188 and 190 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.
[4] The Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union being a bargaining representative for the Agreement, has given notice under s.183 of the Act that it wants the Agreement to cover it. In accordance with s.201(2) and based on the statutory declaration provided by the organisation, I note that the Agreement covers the organisation.
[5] The Agreement was approved on 27 September 2017 and, in accordance with s.54, will operate from 4 October 2017. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 1 December 2017.
COMMISSIONER
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code G, AE425569 PR596408>
Annexure A
- AGLC
- Downer EDI Works Pty Ltd [2017] FWCA 5025
- Case
- [2017] FWCA 5025
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The central legal issues for the Commission to address involved assessing whether the agreement provided fair and reasonable terms for the employees, and whether it complied with the statutory requirements outlined in the Fair Work Act. Specifically, the Commission had to ensure that the agreement was consistent with the national minimum standards, did not discriminate unfairly, and did not adversely affect the terms of employment of any individual employee. Additionally, the Commission examined whether the agreement was genuinely bargained between the parties and whether it adequately represented the interests of the employees.
The Commission meticulously reviewed the provisions of the proposed agreement, considering various aspects such as wage rates, work hours, leave entitlements, and dispute resolution mechanisms. It concluded that the agreement was fair and reasonable, met the necessary statutory requirements, and appropriately represented the interests of the employees. The Commission found that the agreement provided terms and conditions that were not less favourable than the national minimum standards and did not unfairly discriminate against any group of employees. Consequently, the Commission approved the agreement, finding that it was genuinely negotiated and represented the interests of the employees effectively.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.