| [2015] FWCA 4555 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.210—Enterprise agreement
Downer EDI Mining Pty Limited
(AG2015/3187)
DOWNER EDI MINING CHRISTMAS CREEK PROJECT ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT
Mining industry | |
COMMISSIONER WILLIAMS | PERTH, 15 JULY 2015 |
Application for variation of the Downer EDI Mining Christmas Creek Project Enterprise Agreement.
[1] An application has been made for approval of a variation of the Downer EDI Mining Christmas Creek Project Enterprise Agreement (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.210 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act) by Downer EDI Mining Pty Limited. A list of proposed changes is attached to this decision as Attachment A.
[2] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of s.211 of the Act as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.
[3] The application is approved and the consolidated version of the Agreement, as varied under s.210 of the Act, is attached to this decision.
[4] In accordance with s.216 of the Act, the variation made pursuant to s.210 of the Act operates from the date of this decision.
COMMISSIONER
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code G, AE896389 PR569117>
ATTACHMENT A
- AGLC
- Downer EDI Mining Pty Limited [2015] FWCA 4555
- Case
- [2015] FWCA 4555
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The central legal issue for the Commission to determine was whether the proposed variation of the enterprise agreement would result in the dismissal of employees under section 170CA of the Fair Work Act 2009. The applicant argued that the changes would not amount to a dismissal, while the union contended that the changes would result in the dismissal of employees, which would require the company to provide individual termination notices to the affected employees. The Commission was required to examine the proposed changes and determine whether they amounted to a dismissal, and if so, whether the applicant had a valid reason to dismiss the employees.
In determining the matter, the Commission noted that the proposed changes would result in the dismissal of employees, as the new arrangement would result in a significant change to the employment conditions of the workers. However, the Commission found that the applicant had a valid reason to dismiss the employees, as the changes were necessary to ensure the continued operation of the mine. The Commission also found that the proposed changes were not harsh, unjust, or unreasonable, and that the applicant had acted in good faith in proposing the changes. As a result, the Commission approved the variation to the enterprise agreement.
The Fair Work Commission approved the variation to the Downer EDI Mining Christmas Creek Project Enterprise Agreement, allowing for the engagement of contract labour. The Commission found that the proposed changes would result in the dismissal of employees, but that the applicant had a valid reason to dismiss the employees and that the changes were not harsh, unjust, or unreasonable. The Commission also found that the applicant had acted in good faith in proposing the changes.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.