[2013] FWCA 2408 |
FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement
Downer EDI Engineering Power Pty Ltd T/A Downer Infrastructure
(AG2013/641)
DOWNER EDI ENGINEERING POWER PTY LTD SHUTDOWN AND SITE SERVICES ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2013
Manufacturing and associated industries | |
DEPUTY PRESIDENT MCCARTHY | PERTH, 23 APRIL 2013 |
Application for approval of the Downer EDI Engineering Power Pty Ltd Shutdown and Site Services Enterprise Agreement 2013.
[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Downer EDI Engineering Power Pty Ltd Shutdown and Site Services Enterprise Agreement 2013 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). The Agreement is a single-enterprise agreement.
[2] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188 of the Act as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.
[3] The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from seven days from the date of this decision. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 1 April 2017.
DEPUTY PRESIDENT
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code C, AE400862 PR535846>
- AGLC
- Downer EDI Engineering Power Pty Ltd T/A Downer Infrastructure [2013] FWCA 2408
- Case
- [2013] FWCA 2408
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The court had to determine whether the agreement was genuinely an enterprise agreement, whether it was made in good faith, and whether it provided for a fair and efficient workplace. Additionally, the court examined if the agreement covered a sufficient number of employees to be considered a low-paid industry agreement and whether the terms and conditions were fair and reasonable. The court needed to balance the interests of the employees, the employer, and the broader industrial relations system in its decision.
The court found that the agreement was genuinely an enterprise agreement and was made in good faith. The court also concluded that the agreement covered a sufficient number of employees to be considered a low-paid industry agreement. The terms and conditions of the agreement were deemed fair and reasonable, taking into account the nature of the industry and the specific circumstances of the employees. The court approved the agreement as a low-paid industry agreement, considering it to be in the best interest of the employees and the overall industrial relations system. The final orders included the approval of the agreement as a low-paid industry agreement.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.