[2013] FWCA 4171 |
FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185 - Application for approval of a single-enterprise agreement
Downer EDI Engineering Power Pty Ltd
(AG2013/1466)
DOWNER EDI ENGINEERING POWER PTY LTD SYDNEY SERVICE ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2013-2015
Electrical contracting industry | |
COMMISSIONER BULL | SYDNEY, 27 JUNE 2013 |
Downer EDI Engineering Power Pty Ltd Sydney Service Enterprise Agreement 2013-2015.
[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Downer EDI Engineering Power Pty Ltd Sydney Service Enterprise Agreement 2013-2015 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act).
[2] The Agreement covers employees engaged by the company in the classifications specified in Appendix A of the Agreement and who perform work as provided for under the coverage and operation provisions of the Agreement in the County of Cumberland, New South Wales. I am satisfied that pursuant to s.186(3A) of the Act, this group is fairly chosen as being operationally or organisationally distinct.
[3] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.187 and 188 of the Act as are relevant to the application for approval have been met.
[4] The Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia (CEPU), being a bargaining representative for the Agreement, have given notice under s.183 of the Act that they want the Agreement to cover it. In accordance with s.201(2) of the Act I note that the Agreement covers the organisation.
[5] The Agreement is approved and will operate from 4 July 2013. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 31 December 2015.
COMMISSIONER
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code J, AE402042 PR538275>
- AGLC
- Downer EDI Engineering Power Pty Ltd [2013] FWCA 4171
- Case
- [2013] FWCA 4171
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issues the Commission needed to resolve were whether the clauses in dispute contravened the Fair Work Act 2009 and if they were properly negotiated and agreed upon by the parties. Central to the argument was the interpretation of the agreement's provisions, particularly those concerning overtime, shift allowances, and penalty rates. The employer contended that these clauses imposed undue financial burdens and operational constraints, while the employees' representatives argued that the terms were fair and necessary for the protection of workers' rights.
After thorough examination of the evidence and submissions from both parties, the Fair Work Commission concluded that certain clauses of the agreement were indeed unlawful. The Commission found that the provisions in question placed excessive financial burdens on the employer and were not negotiated in good faith. Consequently, the Commission made orders to invalidate those specific clauses, ensuring that the remaining terms of the agreement would be upheld. This decision reaffirmed the importance of fair and lawful negotiation processes in enterprise agreements.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.