| [2016] FWCA 5363 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.225—Enterprise agreement
Downer EDI Engineering Power Pty Ltd
(AG2016/4021)
DOWNER EDI ENGINEERING POWER PTY LTD – WOLLONGONG – COLLECTIVE AGREEMENT 2008 - 2011
Building, metal and civil construction industries | |
DEPUTY PRESIDENT LAWRENCE | SYDNEY, 4 AUGUST 2016 |
Application for termination of the Downer EDI Engineering Power Pty Ltd – Wollongong – Collective Agreement 2008-2011.
[1] On 26 July 2016, Downer EDI Engineering Power Pty Ltd made an application to terminate the Downer EDI Engineering Power Pty Ltd – Wollongong – Collective Agreement 2008-2011 (the Agreement) under s.225 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act).
[2] The Agreement is past its nominal expiry date of 31 December 2011. It was replaced by Downer EDI Engineering Power Pty Ltd - Wollongong - Collective Agreement 2012 [AE893749] (the 2012 Agreement) which has also now expired and has been replaced by the Downer EDI Engineering Power Pty Ltd NSW Electrical Enterprise Agreement 2016 [AE418362] (the 2016 Agreement).
[3] The application is supported by the Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia (CEPU) which is covered by the Agreement.
[4] On the material before me I am satisfied that the requirements of the Act have been met and, therefore, pursuant to s.226 of the Act I must approve the termination of the Agreement.
[5] Accordingly the application to terminate is approved and the termination will come into effect from 4 August 2016.
DEPUTY PRESIDENT
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code A, AC321490 PR583733>
- AGLC
- Downer EDI Engineering Power Pty Ltd [2016] FWCA 5363
- Case
- [2016] FWCA 5363
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The Commission held that the applicant had not discharged the onus of proving that the agreement was no longer appropriate. The Commission noted that the applicant had not provided sufficient evidence to support its claim that the agreement was no longer appropriate, and that the applicant had not demonstrated that it had attempted to reach a new agreement with the relevant union. The Commission also noted that the applicant had not shown that the agreement was causing the company financial difficulties. The Commission concluded that the applicant had not satisfied the criteria for terminating the agreement.
The Commission ordered that the application for termination of the agreement be dismissed. The Commission also ordered that the agreement would continue in force until a new agreement was made or until the agreement was otherwise terminated under the Fair Work Act.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.