Dougruby Pty Ltd v Wingecarribee SC

Case [2004] NSWLEC 706


Land and Environment Court


of New South Wales


CITATION: Dougruby Pty Ltd v Wingecarribee SC [2004] NSWLEC 706
PARTIES:

APPLICANT
Dougruby Pty Limited

RESPONDENT
Wingecarribee Shire Council

FILE NUMBER(S): 10157 of 2004
CORAM: Bly C
KEY ISSUES:

Appeal :- Consent Orders - residential retirement development - access to services.

LEGISLATION CITED: Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979
State Environmental Planning Policy No. 5
CASES CITED:
DATES OF HEARING: 22/12/2004
DATE OF JUDGMENT: 12/23/2004
LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES:


APPLICANT
Ms M Carpenter, solicitor
of Boyd House and Partners

RESPONDENT
Ms C Rose, solicitor
of Wilshire Webb




JUDGMENT:

      THE LAND AND
      ENVIRONMENT COURT
      OF NEW SOUTH WALES

      Bly C

      23 December 2004

      10157 of 2004 Dougruby Pty Limited v Wingecarribee Shire Council

      JUDGMENT

1 This appeal relates to a development application for a residential retirement development on land in Kangoloon and Wiseman Roads, Bowral.

2 In reaching the conclusions that I should grant the consent orders in Exhibit 3 I have taken into account:

        • The statement of basic facts in Exhibit 1.
        • The town planning report of Mr Albyn,
        • The Statement of Environmental Effects,
        • The access report,
        • The council officer’s reports contained in Exhibit 2,
        • The letters of objection in Exhibit 2.

3 Being integrated development, I note that the requirements of the Department of Infrastructure, Planning and Natural Resources and the Rural Fire Services Department have been incorporated into the proposed conditions of consent.

4 I also note that the various requirements of State Environmental Planning Policy No 5 particularly those in cll 12 and 14 have been met by the proposal.

5 The issues which were most recently of concern to the council, especially the matter of the location of the site and its access to services, have been comprehensively dealt with by Mr R Albyn in his report and I am satisfied that the conclusions he has reached on all of those matters (relying also on other associated materials), provides a sufficient response to them and I adopt the recommendations made.

6 I am also satisfied that with the changes to the proposal and taking into account the council officer’s report and that of Mr Albyn, that the residents’ concerns are not such as to require any further changes to the proposal or indeed its rejection.

7 By Consent I therefore make the orders essentially as combined in exhibit 3, as follows:

          1. The appeal pursuant to section 97 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 is upheld.
          2. Development application number LUA03/1717 to construct 84 self care dwellings, four respite units with community facilities pursuant to State Environmental Planning Policy No. 5 at lots 100 and 101 DP841242 Wiseman Road, Bowral, is approved, subject to the conditions in Annexure A.
          3. Exhibits 1, 3, 4 and B are retained.
          4. There is no order as to costs.

____________________________


T A Bly


Commissioner of the Court


ljr

Details
AGLC
Dougruby Pty Ltd v Wingecarribee SC [2004] NSWLEC 706
Case
[2004] NSWLEC 706
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Dougruby Pty Ltd (the applicant) appealed against a decision of the Wingecarribee Shire Council (the council) which rejected the applicant's development application for a residential retirement development on land located at Kangoloon and Wiseman Roads, Bowral. The appeal was heard by the Land and Environment Court of New South Wales, presided over by Bly C. The applicant sought approval for the construction of 84 self-care dwellings, four respite units with community facilities, pursuant to State Environmental Planning Policy No. 5. The key issues before the court were whether the council's decision should be upheld or if the appeal should be granted and the development application approved, subject to certain conditions.

The court considered various reports and submissions, including the statement of basic facts, the town planning report of Mr. Albyn, the statement of environmental effects, the access report, the council officer's reports, and the letters of objection. The court also took into account the requirements of the Department of Infrastructure, Planning and Natural Resources and the Rural Fire Services Department, which had been incorporated into the proposed conditions of consent. The court further noted that the proposal had met the various requirements of State Environmental Planning Policy No. 5, particularly those in clauses 12 and 14. The court was satisfied that the applicant's proposal adequately addressed the council's concerns regarding the location of the site and its access to services.

The court was satisfied that the applicant's proposal, with the changes made, sufficiently addressed the residents' concerns. The court adopted the recommendations made by Mr. Albyn and was satisfied that the applicant's proposal did not require any further changes or rejection. The court granted the appeal and approved the development application, subject to the conditions in Annexure A. The court also retained Exhibits 1, 3, 4 and B, and made no order as to costs.

In summary, the Land and Environment Court of New South Wales granted the applicant's appeal and approved the development application for a residential retirement development on the contested land, subject to certain conditions. The court considered various reports and submissions, and was satisfied that the applicant's proposal adequately addressed the council's and residents' concerns. The court's decision was based on the evidence presented and the requirements of the relevant legislation and policies.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.