Donnelly v Australia and New Zealand Banking Group Ltd
Case
•
[2014] NSWCA 43
•05 March 2014
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
Donnelly v Australia and New Zealand Banking Group Ltd [2014] NSWCA 43
[2014] NSWCA 43
05 March 2014
CaseChat Overview and Summary
In *Donnelly v Australia and New Zealand Banking Group Ltd*, the applicant sought a review under section 46(4) of the *Supreme Court Act 1970* (NSW) of a primary judge's refusal to grant a stay of execution pending an appeal. The dispute concerned the applicant's attempt to prevent the enforcement of a judgment against them.
The primary legal issue before the Court of Appeal was whether the primary judge had erred in principle by refusing to grant the stay of execution. This involved considering whether the applicant had demonstrated sufficient grounds to warrant a stay, particularly in light of the acknowledged, presently owing, and secured indebtedness to the respondent.
The Court of Appeal found no error of principle in the primary judge's decision. Their Honours noted that the applicant had not made an offer to pay the acknowledged indebtedness. Applying established principles regarding the grant of stays of execution, the Court concluded that the applicant had not satisfied the necessary criteria. Consequently, the applicant's notice of motion was dismissed, with costs awarded to the respondent.
The primary legal issue before the Court of Appeal was whether the primary judge had erred in principle by refusing to grant the stay of execution. This involved considering whether the applicant had demonstrated sufficient grounds to warrant a stay, particularly in light of the acknowledged, presently owing, and secured indebtedness to the respondent.
The Court of Appeal found no error of principle in the primary judge's decision. Their Honours noted that the applicant had not made an offer to pay the acknowledged indebtedness. Applying established principles regarding the grant of stays of execution, the Court concluded that the applicant had not satisfied the necessary criteria. Consequently, the applicant's notice of motion was dismissed, with costs awarded to the respondent.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Civil Procedure
-
Statutory Interpretation
Legal Concepts
-
Appeal
-
Costs
-
Jurisdiction
-
Stay of Proceedings
-
Statutory Construction
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Most Recent Citation
Bobolas v Waverley Council [2014] NSWCA 131
Cases Citing This Decision
2
Quach v New South Wales Health Care Complaints Commission (No 3)
[2016] NSWCA 284
Bobolas v Waverley Council
[2014] NSWCA 131
Cases Cited
8
Statutory Material Cited
1
Australia and New Zealand Banking Group Ltd v Donnelly
[2013] NSWSC 1760
Patrick v Howorth
[2002] NSWCA 285
Transglobal Capital Pty Ltd v Yolarno Pty Ltd
[2004] NSWCA 136