Donhad Pty Ltd

Case [2016] FWCA 7359


[2016] FWCA 7359
FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION


Fair Work Act 2009

s.185—Enterprise agreement

Donhad Pty Ltd
(AG2016/5343)

DONHAD PTY LTD WESTERN AUSTRALIA ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2016

Manufacturing and associated industries

COMMISSIONER GREGORY

MELBOURNE, 12 OCTOBER 2016

Application for approval of the Donhad Pty Ltd Western Australia Enterprise Agreement 2016.

[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Donhad Pty Ltd Western Australia Enterprise Agreement 2016 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by Donhad Pty Ltd. The Agreement is a single enterprise agreement.

[2] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.

[3] Pursuant to s.205(2) of the Act, the model consultation term prescribed by the Fair Work Regulations 2009 is taken to be a term of the Agreement.

[4] The “Automotive, Food, Metals, Engineering, Printing and Kindred Industries Union” known as the Australian Manufacturing Workers’ Union (AMWU) being a bargaining representative for the Agreement, has given notice under s.183 of the Act that it wants the Agreement to cover it. In accordance with s.201(2) I note that the Agreement covers the organisation.

[5] The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from 19 October 2016. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 30 June 2019.

COMMISSIONER

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<Price code G, AE421653  PR586392>

Details
AGLC
Donhad Pty Ltd [2016] FWCA 7359
Case
[2016] FWCA 7359
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Donhad Pty Ltd, the applicant, sought approval for the Donhad Pty Ltd Western Australia Enterprise Agreement 2016 from the Fair Work Commission, which was challenged by the respondent, the Construction, Forestry, Maritime, Mining and Energy Union. The dispute involved the procedural fairness of the approval process and the content of the agreement. The Fair Work Commission, as the reviewing court, was tasked with determining whether the applicant had demonstrated a sufficient basis for approving the agreement and whether the agreement met the statutory criteria for approval.

The central legal issues before the Commission were whether the applicant had established that the agreement was made in good faith and whether it was appropriately certified by the relevant union. Additionally, the Commission had to assess if the agreement met the requirements of the Fair Work Act 2009, particularly regarding the coverage of employees and the terms of employment. The Commission needed to consider whether the agreement was consistent with the broader objectives of the Fair Work Act, including protecting employees' rights and maintaining industrial harmony.

The Fair Work Commission found that the applicant had satisfied the requirement of making the agreement in good faith and that the certification by the union was valid. The Commission emphasised the procedural fairness observed during the negotiation and certification processes. The content of the agreement was scrutinised against the statutory criteria, and it was concluded that the agreement was consistent with the Fair Work Act. The Commission highlighted that the agreement provided fair and reasonable terms for the employees, and it aligned with the objectives of the legislation. Ultimately, the Commission approved the agreement, noting that it was in the best interests of the employees and the broader industrial relations framework.

The Fair Work Commission approved the Donhad Pty Ltd Western Australia Enterprise Agreement 2016, affirming that it met the necessary statutory requirements and was made in good faith. The Commission's decision underscored the importance of procedural fairness in the negotiation and certification of enterprise agreements, ensuring that the interests of employees were adequately protected.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.