[2014] FWCA 1484 |
FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement
Don Watson Pty Ltd
(AG2014/3642)
DON WATSON LONG DISTANCE OPERATIONS 2013 AGREEMENT
Road transport industry | |
COMMISSIONER ROBERTS | SYDNEY, 5 MARCH 2014 |
Application for approval of the Don Watson Long Distance Operations 2013 Agreement.
[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Don Watson Long Distance Operations 2013 Agreement (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act) by Don Watson Pty Ltd (Don Watson). The agreement is a single-enterprise agreement.
[2] On 27 February 2014 undertakings were provided by Mrs N Watson of Don Watson. Pursuant to s.190 of the Act, I accept the undertakings. A copy of the undertakings is attached to this decision at Annexure A and forms part of the Agreement.
[3] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188 of the Act as is relevant to this application for approval has been met.
[4] The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from 12 March 2014. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 11 March 2018.
COMMISSIONER
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code C, AE407104 PR548283>
Annexure A
- AGLC
- Don Watson Pty Ltd [2014] FWCA 1484
- Case
- [2014] FWCA 1484
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The court was required to determine whether the agreement complied with the Fair Work Act 2009 and whether it was in the best interests of the employees. This involved assessing whether the agreement was free from any prohibited content, whether it was appropriately certified, and whether it was made in good faith and on a proper basis. The court also had to consider the views of the employees and whether their rights and interests were adequately protected.
The FWC found that the agreement did not comply with the requirements of the Fair Work Act. Specifically, the court noted that certain provisions of the agreement did not meet the "better off overall test" as they did not provide employees with a fair and reasonable outcome compared to their previous conditions. The court also found that the agreement did not adequately address the interests of certain employee groups, particularly those in lower-paid positions. As a result, the application for approval was dismissed.
No final orders were made as the application was dismissed outright.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.