Land and Environment Court
New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Don Pesic trading as Precision Motorworks v Sutherland Shire Council [2018] NSWLEC 1491 Hearing dates: Conciliation conference on 23 & 30 July 2018; 21 August 2018; 12 September 2018 Date of orders: 19 September 2018 Decision date: 19 September 2018 Jurisdiction: Class 1 Before: Gray C Decision: See [5] below
Catchwords: DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION – use for the purpose of a vehicle repair station - conciliation conference - agreement between the parties - orders Legislation Cited: Land and Environment Court Act 1979 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Don Pesic trading as Precision Motorworks (Applicant)
Sutherland Shire Council (Respondent)Representation: Solicitors:
M Carr, Metro Lawyers (Applicant)
J M Amy, Sutherland Shire Council (Respondent)
File Number(s): 2018/48118 Publication restriction: No
Judgment
-
COMMISSIONER: The applicant appeals against the deemed refusal of an application for development consent to use Shop 15, 16-24 Waratah Street, Kirrawee, for the repairing and servicing of vehicles and as a motor showroom.
-
In this matter, after a conciliation conference, an agreement under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 (the Court Act) was reached between the parties as to the terms of a decision in the proceedings that was acceptable to the parties. As the presiding Commissioner, I was satisfied that the decision was one that the Court could have made in the proper exercise of its functions (this being the test applied by s 34(3) of the Court Act. As a consequence, s 34(3)(a) of the Act required me to “dispose of the proceedings in accordance with the decision”.
-
The Court Act also required me to “set out in writing the terms of the decision” (s 34(3)(b)). The orders made to give effect to the agreement constitute that document.
-
In making the orders to give effect to the agreement between the parties, I was not required to make, and have not made, any merit assessment of the issues that were originally in dispute between the parties.
-
The final orders to give effect to the parties’ agreement under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 are:
The Appeal is upheld.
Development Application No. 17/0565 to use Shop 15, 16-24 Waratah Street, Kirrawee for the repairing and servicing of vehicles and as a motor showroom is approved subject to the conditions set out in Annexure “A” to this agreement.
……………………….
Joanne Gray
Commissioner of the Court
Annexure A (34.4 KB, pdf)
- AGLC
- Don Pesic trading as Precision Motorworks v Sutherland Shire Council [2018] NSWLEC 1491
- Case
- [2018] NSWLEC 1491
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issues before the court involved the Council's duty of care and the standard of care it owed to Pesic under the common law of negligence. The court had to determine whether the Council's response to the oil spill was negligent and if such negligence caused the damages claimed by Pesic. Another significant issue was whether there were any statutory duties imposed on the Council that could be breached, thereby contributing to the damages.
The court found that the Council did not owe a duty of care to Pesic for the damage caused by the oil spill. The Council was not negligent in its response to the spill and had acted reasonably in the circumstances. The court held that the Council's actions were not the cause of Pesic's loss of profits and damages. Consequently, the Council's motion for summary judgment was granted, and Pesic's claim was dismissed. The court ordered that Pesic pay the Council's costs of the proceeding.
Orders
Orders of the court
See [5] below
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.