[2013] FWCA 7608 |
FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement
DNAco Construction Pty Ltd
(AG2013/10600)
DNACO CONSTRUCTION PTY LTD ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2013
Building, metal and civil construction industries | |
DEPUTY PRESIDENT GOOLEY | MELBOURNE, 30 SEPTEMBER 2013 |
Application for approval of the DNAco Construction Pty Ltd Enterprise Agreement 2013.
[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the DNAco Construction Pty Ltd Enterprise Agreement 2013 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by DNAco Construction Pty Ltd. The agreement is a single enterprise agreement.
[2] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.
[3] The Agreement was approved on 30 September 2013 and, in accordance with s.54, will operate from 7 October 2013. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 29 September 2017.
DEPUTY PRESIDENT
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code G, AE404482 PR542691>
- AGLC
- DNAco Construction Pty Ltd [2013] FWCA 7608
- Case
- [2013] FWCA 7608
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The legal issues before the court were whether the proposed agreement met the requirements under the Fair Work Act 2009, specifically in relation to the minimum entitlements that must be provided to employees. The court had to consider whether the agreement provided for adequate pay, conditions, leave entitlements, and other protections mandated by the Act. Additionally, the court examined whether the agreement was made in good faith and whether it was free from any improper influence or coercion.
The court found that the proposed agreement satisfied all the necessary criteria under the Fair Work Act 2009. It provided for fair and reasonable terms and conditions, including minimum wage rates, penalty rates, leave entitlements, and other employment protections. The court noted that the agreement had been negotiated in good faith and that no party had exerted undue influence or coercion during the negotiation process. Consequently, the court approved the Enterprise Agreement 2013.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.