DISHMAN & DISHMAN (No.2)

In DISHMAN & DISHMAN (No.2), heard by Judge Harman, the dispute concerned the adjustment of property interests between a husband and wife. The husband was self-represented and had withdrawn and disengaged from the proceedings. The court noted that there was little controversy regarding the evidence, with the available assets and their net value being agreed or clearly established.

The court was required to determine the appropriate property adjustment, considering the parties' contributions, including the wife's significant inheritance during the marriage, her homemaker contributions, and the husband's primary wage-earning contributions. The court also had to consider the factors outlined in section 75(2) of the relevant legislation.

The court's reasoning focused on achieving a just and equitable outcome, taking into account the established contributions and financial resources of each party. The orders made reflect a division of assets, including the proceeds from the sale of the former matrimonial home, the transfer of specific properties, and the allocation of vehicles and other financial resources. The court also made provision for the execution of necessary documents by the Registrar or Deputy Registrar in the event of a party's default, and outlined a process for the disbursement of sale proceeds from the properties. The wife was given the option to pursue costs.