DIRECTOR-GENERAL, DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITIES, CHILD SAFETY AND DISABILITY SERVICES & TOREITI
Case
•
[2013] FamCA 352
•22 May 2013
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
DIRECTOR-GENERAL, DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITIES, CHILD SAFETY AND DISABILITY SERVICES & TOREITI [2013] FamCA 352
[2013] FamCA 352
22 May 2013
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The parties before the court were the Director-General, Department of Communities, Child Safety and Disability Services (the Applicant) and Ms Toreiti, also known as Ms Murray (the Respondent Mother), concerning the welfare of a female child, E. The dispute centred on the return of the child to New Zealand. The matter was heard by Kent J of the Family Court of Australia.
The primary legal issue before the court was whether the child, E, should be returned to New Zealand. This involved determining the appropriate orders to facilitate such a return, including restrictions on the Respondent Mother's actions and the involvement of various government agencies.
Kent J ordered that the child, E, be returned to New Zealand on or before 22 June 2013. The court imposed several conditions to give effect to this order, including restraining the Respondent Mother from removing the child from Australia or changing her residence. The Commissioner of the Australian Federal Police was directed to retain the names of the Respondent Mother and child on the All Ports Watch Alert System, with provisions for their removal upon confirmation of travel arrangements. The Marshal of the Family Court, the Australian Federal Police, and State and Territory police forces were empowered to take necessary steps to enforce the orders. The court also ordered that an officer of the Department of Communities, Child Safety & Disability Services release the child's passports for the return journey and the Respondent Mother's passport upon request. Furthermore, the Respondent Mother was ordered to pay all expenses associated with the child's return, with provisions for reimbursement to the Applicant if she failed to do so. Liberty to apply was granted to the Applicant for further necessary orders, and all other applications were dismissed.
The primary legal issue before the court was whether the child, E, should be returned to New Zealand. This involved determining the appropriate orders to facilitate such a return, including restrictions on the Respondent Mother's actions and the involvement of various government agencies.
Kent J ordered that the child, E, be returned to New Zealand on or before 22 June 2013. The court imposed several conditions to give effect to this order, including restraining the Respondent Mother from removing the child from Australia or changing her residence. The Commissioner of the Australian Federal Police was directed to retain the names of the Respondent Mother and child on the All Ports Watch Alert System, with provisions for their removal upon confirmation of travel arrangements. The Marshal of the Family Court, the Australian Federal Police, and State and Territory police forces were empowered to take necessary steps to enforce the orders. The court also ordered that an officer of the Department of Communities, Child Safety & Disability Services release the child's passports for the return journey and the Respondent Mother's passport upon request. Furthermore, the Respondent Mother was ordered to pay all expenses associated with the child's return, with provisions for reimbursement to the Applicant if she failed to do so. Liberty to apply was granted to the Applicant for further necessary orders, and all other applications were dismissed.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Family Law
-
Administrative Law
Legal Concepts
-
Jurisdiction
-
Remedies
-
Injunction
-
Procedural Fairness
-
Standing
-
Costs
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Cases Citing This Decision
0
Cases Cited
4
Statutory Material Cited
0
Department of Family and Community Services & Raho
[2013] FamCA 530
Department of Family and Community Services & Raho
[2013] FamCA 530