Director, Fair Work Building Industry Inspectorate v CFMEU
Case
•
[2013] FCCA 2130
•10 October 2013
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
DIRECTOR, FAIR WORK BUILDING INDUSTRY INSPECTORATE v CFMEU & ANOR
[2013] FCCA 2130
[2013] FCCA 2130
10 October 2013
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The Director, Fair Work Building Industry Inspectorate (the applicant) brought proceedings against the Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union (CFMEU) (the respondent) seeking penalties for alleged unlawful industrial action. The matter was heard by Judge Burnett in the Federal Court of Australia.
The central legal issue before the Court was whether the agreed penalty of $10,000, proposed by the parties, was appropriate for the contravention of the *Fair Work Act 2009* (Cth) by the CFMEU. This required the Court to consider the general principles governing the imposition of penalties in industrial law, including the purpose of penalties, the nature of the contravention, and the need for deterrence.
Judge Burnett applied the established principles for determining the appropriateness of agreed penalties. His Honour considered the seriousness of the contravention, the need to uphold the rule of law in the building industry, and the importance of penalties serving a deterrent purpose. While acknowledging the parties' agreement, the Court retained its independent discretion to ensure the penalty reflected the gravity of the conduct and adequately deterred future contraventions.
Ultimately, Judge Burnett found the agreed penalty of $10,000 to be appropriate in the circumstances and ordered the CFMEU to pay this amount.
The central legal issue before the Court was whether the agreed penalty of $10,000, proposed by the parties, was appropriate for the contravention of the *Fair Work Act 2009* (Cth) by the CFMEU. This required the Court to consider the general principles governing the imposition of penalties in industrial law, including the purpose of penalties, the nature of the contravention, and the need for deterrence.
Judge Burnett applied the established principles for determining the appropriateness of agreed penalties. His Honour considered the seriousness of the contravention, the need to uphold the rule of law in the building industry, and the importance of penalties serving a deterrent purpose. While acknowledging the parties' agreement, the Court retained its independent discretion to ensure the penalty reflected the gravity of the conduct and adequately deterred future contraventions.
Ultimately, Judge Burnett found the agreed penalty of $10,000 to be appropriate in the circumstances and ordered the CFMEU to pay this amount.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Employment Law
-
Statutory Interpretation
Legal Concepts
-
Penalty
-
Breach
-
Remedies
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Most Recent Citation
Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union-Construction and General Division, Queensland Northern Territory Divisional Branch [2015] FWC 6708
Cases Citing This Decision
4
Director, Fair Work Building Industry Inspectorate v Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union
[2016] FCCA 1692
Australian Building and Construction Commissioner v Pauls
[2017] FCA 843
Australian Workers’ Union
[2021] FWC 1200
Cases Cited
4
Statutory Material Cited
4
Construction, Forestry, Mining & Energy Union v Coal & Allied Operations Pty Ltd (No 2)
[1999] FCA 1714
Finance Sector Union v Commonwealth Bank of Australia
[2005] FCA 1847
Royer v The State of Western Australia
[2009] WASCA 139