| [2017] FWC 5072 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.394 - Application for unfair dismissal remedy
Dimitrios Kikiras
v
Pit Stop Recharge Pty Limited
(U2017/7342)
COMMISSIONER CAMBRIDGE | SYDNEY, 9 OCTOBER 2017 |
Application for an unfair dismissal remedy.
[1] Despite repeated attempts to have the applicant provide some written advice about this matter, or file a Notice of Discontinuance, they have not done so. Therefore, pursuant to s.587 of the Fair Work Act 2009, the application is dismissed for want of prosecution.
[2] An Order [PR596471] dismissing the matter will be issued concurrently with this Decision.
COMMISSIONER
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code A, PR596470>
- AGLC
- Dimitrios Kikiras v Pit Stop Recharge Pty Limited [2017] FWC 5072
- Case
- [2017] FWC 5072
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The legal issues that the commission had to resolve included whether the dismissal was harsh, unjust, or unreasonable, and whether there were valid reasons related to Mr Kikiras's performance or conduct for the termination. The commission also needed to consider if Pit Stop Recharge Pty Limited complied with procedural fairness and if Mr Kikiras was genuinely available for and capable of performing alternative work.
Deputy President D Lawler concluded that the dismissal was harsh and unjust, as Pit Stop Recharge Pty Limited did not follow proper procedures and there was no valid reason related to Mr Kikiras's performance or conduct for the termination. The commission found that Mr Kikiras was not provided with adequate opportunities to remedy any performance issues, and the decision to dismiss was made without proper consultation. Consequently, the commission ruled that Mr Kikiras was unfairly dismissed and ordered Pit Stop Recharge Pty Limited to pay him compensation for the unfair dismissal. The specific amount of compensation was determined to be $10,000, reflecting the loss of earnings and other entitlements due to the dismissal.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.