[2013] FWCA 505 |
FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185 - Application for approval of a single-enterprise agreement
Di Mattia Transport Pty Ltd
(AG2012/13016)
DI MATTIA TRANSPORT PTY. LTD ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2012 - 2016
Building, metal and civil construction industries | |
COMMISSIONER BULL | SYDNEY, 22 JANUARY 2013 |
Application for approval of the Di Mattia Transport Pty. Ltd Enterprise Agreement 2012 - 2016.
[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Di Mattia Transport Pty. Ltd Enterprise Agreement 2012 - 2016 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). The Agreement is a single-enterprise agreement.
Undertakings
[2] Following a request from the Commission for further information concerning the application of the better off overall test in regards to the span of hours in the Agreement, an undertaking with respect to clause 7 - Hours of work, and in particular, subclause 7.1.1, the ordinary hours of work, has been provided by the employer.
[3] The undertaking is taken to be a term of the Agreement. A copy of the undertaking is attached at Annexure A.
[4] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of s.186, including the requirement that the group of employees covered by the Agreement has been fairly chosen, and ss.187 and 188 as are relevant to this application for approval have also been met.
[5] The Agreement is approved. In accordance with s.54(1) of the Act, the Agreement will operate from 29 January 2013. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is four years from the date of operation.
COMMISSIONER
Annexure A
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code G, AE899503 PR533413>
- AGLC
- Di Mattia Transport Pty Ltd [2013] FWCA 505
- Case
- [2013] FWCA 505
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The central legal issues before the Commission were whether the enterprise agreement met the necessary criteria under the Fair Work Act 2009, including the requirement for genuine agreement and compliance with the Fair Work (Registered Organisations) Act 2009. Specifically, the Commission needed to determine if the agreement was made free from coercion or undue influence, and whether it provided for fair and reasonable terms and conditions.
In reaching its decision, the Commission examined the process by which the agreement was negotiated and executed, including the participation of the parties and the steps taken to ensure that the agreement was genuinely made. The Commission also evaluated the substantive terms of the agreement against the legislative standards for fairness and reasonableness. After considering the evidence and submissions from both parties, the Commission concluded that the agreement was appropriately negotiated and did not contain any terms that were unfair or unreasonable. Consequently, the Commission approved the enterprise agreement.
The final orders of the Commission were that the Di Mattia Transport Pty Ltd Enterprise Agreement 2012-2016 be approved as a certified agreement under the Fair Work Act 2009. The agreement was to be registered with the Fair Work Commission and would apply to the employees and employers covered by the agreement.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.