Dhupam and Keyush
Case
•
[2009] FamCA 208
•18 February 2009
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
Dhupam and Keyush [2009] FamCA 208
[2009] FamCA 208
18 February 2009
CaseChat Overview and Summary
In the matter of *Dhupam and Keyush*, the District Court of New South Wales, presided over by Faulks DCJ, considered an application to discharge existing primary parenting orders and substitute them with new consent orders. The original parenting orders had been made on 19 August 2008 and subsequently amended on 24 November 2008 and 11 December 2008.
The central legal issue before the court was whether to discharge the previously made parenting orders and, if so, to give effect to a Minute of Orders sought by the consent of the parties. The court was also required to consider a specific amendment proposed to one of the consent orders.
Faulks DCJ discharged the primary parenting orders made in 2008. The court then gave effect to the Minute of Orders agreed upon by the parties, with one amendment. This amendment modified consent order 12(d) by adding the words "before such expense(s) have been incurred" to the end of the sentence that concluded with "such expense or expenses."
The central legal issue before the court was whether to discharge the previously made parenting orders and, if so, to give effect to a Minute of Orders sought by the consent of the parties. The court was also required to consider a specific amendment proposed to one of the consent orders.
Faulks DCJ discharged the primary parenting orders made in 2008. The court then gave effect to the Minute of Orders agreed upon by the parties, with one amendment. This amendment modified consent order 12(d) by adding the words "before such expense(s) have been incurred" to the end of the sentence that concluded with "such expense or expenses."
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Family Law
-
Civil Procedure
Legal Concepts
-
Consent
-
Remedies
-
Procedural Fairness
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Citations
Dhupam and Keyush [2009] FamCA 208
Cases Citing This Decision
0
Cases Cited
2
Statutory Material Cited
1
Miller v Harrington
[2008] FamCAFC 150
Yard & Rodd (No. 2)
[2008] FamCA 1173