[2013] FWCA 435 |
FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement
DHL Supply Chain (Australia) Pty Ltd
(AG2012/14509)
DHL SUPPLY CHAIN (AUSTRALIA) PTY. LIMITED & NATIONAL UNION OF WORKERS, WORKPLACE LOGISTICS SERVICES AGREEMENT - NEW SOUTH WALES, 2013
Storage services | |
JUSTICE BOULTON, SENIOR DEPUTY PRESIDENT | SYDNEY, 24 JANUARY 2013 |
Application for approval of the DHL Supply Chain (Australia) Pty. Limited & National Union of Workers, Workplace Logistics Services Agreement - New South Wales, 2013.
[1] An application has been made for the approval of an enterprise agreement known as the DHL Supply Chain (Australia) Pty. Limited & National Union of Workers, Workplace Logistics Service Agreement - New South Wales, 2013 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). The Agreement is a single-enterprise agreement.
[2] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188 that are relevant to this application for approval have been met.
[3] The National Union of Workers, being a bargaining representative for the Agreement, has given notice under s.183 of the Act that it wants the Agreement to cover it. In accordance with s.201(2) of the Act, I note the Agreement covers the organisation.
[4] The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from 31 January 2013. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 8 January 2016.
SENIOR DEPUTY PRESIDENT
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code G, AE899456 PR533323>
- AGLC
- DHL Supply Chain (Australia) Pty Ltd [2013] FWCA 435
- Case
- [2013] FWCA 435
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The legal issues before the Commission were whether the proposed agreement was a genuine enterprise agreement and if it adhered to the provisions of the Act. The Commission needed to determine if the agreement was made in good faith, was simple, open, and direct, and if it contained the necessary elements required by the Act. Additionally, the Commission had to consider if the agreement appropriately balanced the interests of the employer and the employees.
The Fair Work Commission found that the proposed agreement was a genuine enterprise agreement, as it was made in good faith and contained the required elements under the Fair Work Act. The Commission was satisfied that the agreement was simple, open, and direct, and it balanced the interests of both the employer and the employees. Consequently, the application for approval of the DHL Supply Chain (Australia) Pty Ltd & National Union of Workers, Workplace Logistics Services Agreement - New South Wales, 2013, was approved. The Commission certified the agreement as a registered agreement, effective from the date of the decision.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.