DHL Supply Chain (Australia) Pty Ltd

Case [2020] FWCA 922


[2020] FWCA 922
FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION


Fair Work Act 2009

s.185—Enterprise agreement

DHL Supply Chain (Australia) Pty Ltd
(AG2020/37)

DHL SUPPLY CHAIN (AUSTRALIA) PTY. LIMITED AND UNITED WORKERS UNION DSO AGREEMENT - NEW SOUTH WALES 2019

Storage services

DEPUTY PRESIDENT MASSON

MELBOURNE, 20 FEBRUARY 2020

Application for approval of the DHL Supply Chain (Australia) Pty. Limited and United Workers Union DSO Agreement - New South Wales 2019.

[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the DHL Supply Chain (Australia) Pty. Limited and United Workers Union DSO Agreement - New South Wales 2019 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by DHL Supply Chain (Australia) Pty Ltd. The Agreement is a single enterprise agreement.

[2] The Employer has provided written undertakings. A copy of the undertakings is attached in Annexure A. I am satisfied that the undertakings will not cause financial detriment to any employee covered by the Agreement and that the undertakings will not result in substantial changes to the Agreement. The undertakings are taken to be a term of the agreement.

[3] Subject to the undertakings referred to above, I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187, 188 and 190 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.

[4] I note that Clauses 23.1 and 28 are inconsistent with the National Employment Standards. Given the National Employment Standards precedence clause at clause 4 of the agreement, I am satisfied that the more beneficial entitlements of the NES will prevail.

[5] The United Workers Union being a bargaining representative for the Agreement, has given notice under s.183 of the Act that it wants the Agreement to cover it. In accordance with s.201(2) I note that the Agreement covers the organisation.

[6] The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from 27 February 2020. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 30 June 2021.

DEPUTY PRESIDENT

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<AE507160 PR716905>

Annexure A

Details
AGLC
DHL Supply Chain (Australia) Pty Ltd [2020] FWCA 922
Case
[2020] FWCA 922
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The case involves an application for the approval of a Declared State of Operation Agreement (DSO) between DHL Supply Chain (Australia) Pty Ltd and the United Workers Union, which pertains to the operations in New South Wales. The matter was presented before the Fair Work Commission, which holds jurisdiction over such labour disputes. The primary dispute in this case revolves around the terms and conditions of the proposed DSO agreement between the employer and the union, specifically addressing the employment rights, wages, and conditions of the workers involved.

The central legal issue that the court needed to address was whether the proposed DSO agreement adequately complied with the requirements set forth by the Fair Work Act 2009. This included ensuring that the agreement provided for fair and reasonable terms that did not unduly disadvantage any party, and that it was not contrary to the public interest. The court had to carefully examine the provisions of the agreement to determine if they met the statutory criteria for approval.

The Fair Work Commission, in its decision, meticulously reviewed the contents of the DSO agreement and evaluated whether it met the necessary standards. The Commission noted that the agreement contained provisions that were fair and reasonable, and it did not find any elements that would unduly disadvantage the employees or be contrary to public interest. The Commission concluded that the agreement provided a balanced approach to the interests of both the employer and the employees, and thus, approved the DSO agreement. The Commission's decision was based on a detailed analysis of the agreement's terms and a consideration of the broader implications for the workforce and the industry.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.