Desprez and Desprez (No 2)
Case
•
[2015] FamCA 868
•6 October 2015
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
Desprez and Desprez (No 2) [2015] FamCA 868
[2015] FamCA 868
6 October 2015
CaseChat Overview and Summary
In *Desprez and Desprez (No 2)*, Cronin J of the Supreme Court of Tasmania considered an application and a response, both seeking final orders, which had been brought before the court.
The central legal issue before the court was whether the applications should be struck out for want of prosecution.
Cronin J determined that the applications should be struck out for want of prosecution. The court's reasoning and the specific legal principles applied in reaching this conclusion are to be found in the transcribed reasons for judgment.
The court ordered that the application of the applicant and the response thereto, both seeking final orders, be struck out for want of prosecution. The court also ordered that its reasons be transcribed and placed on the court file.
The central legal issue before the court was whether the applications should be struck out for want of prosecution.
Cronin J determined that the applications should be struck out for want of prosecution. The court's reasoning and the specific legal principles applied in reaching this conclusion are to be found in the transcribed reasons for judgment.
The court ordered that the application of the applicant and the response thereto, both seeking final orders, be struck out for want of prosecution. The court also ordered that its reasons be transcribed and placed on the court file.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Civil Procedure
Legal Concepts
-
Abuse of Process
-
Costs
-
Procedural Fairness
-
Stay of Proceedings
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Cases Citing This Decision
0
Cases Cited
0
Statutory Material Cited
1