Deputy Commissioner of Taxation v The Nest Egg Co Pty Limited

Case [2010] FCA 1506


FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA

Deputy Commissioner of Taxation v The Nest Egg Co Pty Limited [2010] FCA 1506

Citation: Deputy Commissioner of Taxation v The Nest Egg Co Pty Limited [2010] FCA 1506
Parties: DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF TAXATION v THE NEST EGG CO PTY LIMITED
File number(s): NSD 1546 of 2010
Judge: EMMETT J
Date of judgment: 10 December 2010
Legislation: Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) s 459P
Date of hearing: 10 December 2010
Place: Sydney
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: No catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 4
Counsel for the Plaintiff: C. Burnett
Solicitor for the Plaintiff: Australian Taxation Office
Counsel for the Defendant: The defendant did not appear

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA

NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY

GENERAL DIVISION

NSD 1546 of 2010

BETWEEN:

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF TAXATION
Applicant

AND:

THE NEST EGG CO PTY LIMITED
Respondent

JUDGE:

EMMETT J

DATE OF ORDER:

10 DECEMBER 2010

WHERE MADE:

SYDNEY

THE COURT ORDERS THAT:

1.The defendant company be wound up.

2.Mr Mark Roufeil, liquidator, be appointed liquidator of the defendant company.

3.The plaintiff’s costs in the sum of $4,758.11 be paid out of the assets of the defendant company.

Note:Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.
The text of entered orders can be located using Federal Law Search on the Court’s website.


IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA

NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY

GENERAL DIVISION

NSD 1546 of 2010

BETWEEN:

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF TAXATION
Applicant

AND:

THE NEST EGG CO PTY LIMITED
Respondent

JUDGE:

EMMETT J

DATE:

10 DECEMBER 2010

PLACE:

SYDNEY

REASONS FOR JUDGMENT

  1. The Deputy Commissioner of Taxation has applied under s 459P of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) (the Corporations Act) for an order that the defendant, The Nest Egg Co Pty Ltd (the Company), be wound up on the ground of insolvency.  The basis of alleged insolvency on the part of the Company is failure to comply with a statutory demand. 

  2. I am satisfied that a statutory demand for payment of a debt due to the Deputy Commissioner was sent to the Company by pre-paid post to its registered office on 6 August 2010.  The Company did not comply with the statutory demand.  I am satisfied that the Company is indebted to the Deputy Commissioner in the sum of $57,269.81.  This winding up application was duly advertised in the Sydney Morning Herald Newspaper on the 29 November 2010. 

  3. There was no appearance for the Company when the matter was called before the Registrar this morning.  However, the Registrar referred the matter to me, as duty judge, on the basis there may have been a question as to costs.  In the circumstances I do not propose to say anything about the question. 

  4. I am satisfied that the Company is insolvent. Accordingly, I propose to order that the Company be wound up in insolvency under the provisions of the Corporations Act, that Mr Mark Roufeil, who has consented to act, be appointed as liquidator of the Company and that the Deputy Commissioner’s costs in the sum of $4758.11 be paid out of the assets of the Company.

I certify that the preceding four (4) numbered paragraphs are a true copy of the Reasons for Judgment herein of the Honourable Justice Emmett.

Associate:

Dated:        31 January 2011

Details
AGLC
Deputy Commissioner of Taxation v The Nest Egg Co Pty Limited [2010] FCA 1506
Case
[2010] FCA 1506
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In the case of Deputy Commissioner of Taxation v The Nest Egg Co Pty Limited, the Deputy Commissioner sought an order for the winding up of the company on the basis of insolvency, specifically due to the company's failure to comply with a statutory demand. The statutory demand, amounting to $57,269.81, was issued to the company on 6 August 2010 and was not complied with, leading to the winding up application being advertised in the Sydney Morning Herald on 29 November 2010. The company did not appear before the court, and the matter was referred to the judge for consideration, particularly regarding the issue of costs.

The court was required to determine whether the statutory demand was validly issued and if the company's failure to comply constituted insolvency. Given the evidence presented, the court found that the statutory demand was indeed valid and that the company had failed to meet its obligations, confirming insolvency. The court also considered the absence of the company's appearance and the implications for the costs associated with the proceedings.

The court concluded that the company was insolvent and granted the Deputy Commissioner's application for winding up the company. The court appointed Mr Mark Roufeil as the liquidator and ordered that the costs of $4,758.11 be paid from the company’s assets. This decision underscores the strict requirements for compliance with statutory demands and the consequences for non-compliance under the Corporations Act.

Orders

Orders of the court

1. The defendant company be wound up.

2. Mr Mark Roufeil, liquidator, be appointed liquidator of the defendant company.

3. The plaintiff’s costs in the sum of $4,758.11 be paid out of the assets of the defendant company.

Note:

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

The Deputy Commissioner of Taxation has applied under s 459P of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) (the Corporations Act) for an order that the defendant, The Nest Egg Co Pty Ltd (the Company), be wound up on the ground of insolvency. The basis of alleged insolvency on the part of the Company is failure to comply with a statutory demand. I am satisfied that a statutory demand for payment of a debt due to the Deputy Commissioner was sent to the Company by pre-paid post to its registered office on 6 August 2010. The Company did not comply with the statutory demand. I am satisfied that the Company is indebted to the Deputy Commissioner in the sum of $57,269.81. This winding up application was duly advertised in the Sydney Morning Herald Newspaper on the 29 November 2010. There was no appearance for the Company when the matter was called before the Registrar this morning. However, the Registrar referred the matter to me, as duty judge, on the basis there may have been a question as to costs. In the circumstances I do not propose to say anything about the question. I am satisfied that the Company is insolvent. Accordingly, I propose to order that the Company be wound up in insolvency under the provisions of the Corporations Act, that Mr Mark Roufeil, who has consented to act, be appointed as liquidator of the Company and that the Deputy Commissioner’s costs in the sum of $4758.11 be paid out of the assets of the Company.