Deputy Commissioner of Taxation v T.D. Preece Pty Ltd (No 2)

Case [2013] FCA 1421


FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA

Deputy Commissioner of Taxation v T.D. Preece Pty Ltd (No 2)
[2013] FCA 1421

Citation: Deputy Commissioner of Taxation v T.D. Preece Pty Ltd (No 2) [2013] FCA 1421
Parties: DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF TAXATION v T.D. PREECE PTY LTD ACN 149 377 800
File number: NSD 1181 of 2013
Judge: GRIFFITHS J
Date of judgment: 20 December 2013
Catchwords: CORPORATIONS – winding up of a company in insolvency – orders giving effect to judgment in Deputy Commissioner of Taxation v T.D. Preece Pty Ltd [2013] FCA 1365
Date of hearing: Heard on the papers
Date of last submissions: 19 December 2013
Place: Sydney
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 4
Counsel for the Plaintiff: Mr K Metlej (solicitor)
Solicitor for the Plaintiff: Craddock Murray Neumann Lawyers
Counsel for the Defendant: Mr M Maconachie
Solicitor for the Defendant: Zeina Touma

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA

NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY

GENERAL DIVISION

NSD 1181 of 2013

BETWEEN:

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF TAXATION
Plaintiff

AND:

T.D. PREECE PTY LTD ACN 149 377 800
Defendant

JUDGE:

GRIFFITHS J

DATE OF ORDER:

20 DECEMBER 2013

WHERE MADE:

SYDNEY

THE COURT ORDERS THAT:

1.The defendant pay to the plaintiff (by Electronic Funds Transfer) the following amounts:

(a)within 120 days following judgment being delivered in Supreme Court Proceedings No. 277747 of 2008 between Aletta Sutton and Glenn Preece, the outstanding balance of the amount of $156,617.53 (being the amount payable to the Plaintiff in respect of the Creditor’s Statutory Demand for Payment of Debt dated 6 March 2013 plus any General Interest Charges thereon from 6 March 2013 to the date on which final payment is made to the plaintiff – hereinafter referred to in these orders as the “Statutory Demand Amount”);

(b)until payment in full is made in accordance with Order 1(a):

(i)$45,000 on or before 4:00 pm on or before 3 January 2014;

(ii)subject to Order 1(b)(iii) below, consecutive monthly instalments of at least $6,500 each, the first instalment to be paid by 4:00 pm on 3 February 2014, and subsequent instalments to be paid by 4:00 pm on the 3rd day of each consecutive month, with such instalments to continue until such time as they have been reduced to less than $6,500.

(iii)if the Statutory Demand Amount has been reduced to less than $6,500, the balance of the Statutory Demand Amount shall be paid by the 3rd day of the month following the month in which the last instalment was paid under Order 1(b)(ii) above.

2.By no later than 4:00 pm on 14 February 2014, the defendant is to lodge with the plaintiff all Business Activity Statements and Instalment Activity Statements which are outstanding as at the date of these Orders.

3.The defendant is to pay the plaintiff’s costs fixed in the amount of $12,245.80 by 4:00 pm on 3 February 2014.

4.If the defendant fails to comply with any of Orders 1 to 3:

(a)       T.D. Preece Pty Ltd be wound up;

(b)Steven Nicols of Nicols & Brien Business Recovery is appointed the liquidator of the defendant corporation;

(c)the plaintiff’s costs of these proceedings be fixed in the amount of $12,245.80,

with effect from the date of the first non-compliance with Orders 1 to 3. 

5.The parties, and Steven Nicols, have liberty to apply in relation to the implementation of these orders.

AND THE COURT NOTES THAT:

6.General Interest Charge will continue to accrue in accordance with the relevant statutes on outstanding amounts payable by the defendant to the plaintiff, including the balance of the Statutory Demand Amount, payable from time to time and is in no way affected by these Orders.

7.Notwithstanding these Orders, the defendant’s taxation liabilities remain immediately due and payable and nothing in these Orders imposes an obligation on the plaintiff to accept payment of the Statutory Demand Amount or other amounts which are or become due by the defendant to the plaintiff by instalments; and

8.These orders do not affect the right of the plaintiff to take any recovery action available to him in respect of the Statutory Demand Amount or other amounts which are or become due by the defendant to the plaintiff. 

Note:Entry of orders is dealt with in Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011.


IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA

NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY

GENERAL DIVISION

NSD 1181 of 2013

BETWEEN:

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF TAXATION
Plaintiff

AND:

T.D. PREECE PTY LTD ACN 149 377 800
Defendant

JUDGE:

GRIFFITHS J

DATE:

20 DECEMBER 2013

PLACE:

SYDNEY

REASONS FOR JUDGMENT

  1. The parties have been unable to agree orders giving effect to the reasons for judgment in these proceedings delivered on 16 December 2013 (Deputy Commissioner of Taxation v T.D. Preece Pty Ltd [2013] FCA 1365).

  2. The orders proposed by the plaintiff more accurately and appropriately give effect to the reasons for judgment.  Two matters warrant brief comment.  First, I accept the plaintiff’s submission that order 1(a) is appropriate having regard to the Court’s finding that the reasons for the non-payment of the defendant’s taxation liabilities is the pendency of the proceedings in the Supreme Court and Mr Preece’s current inability to deal with his personal assets before those proceedings are finalised.  In those circumstances, it is reasonable to order that the taxation liabilities be paid in full following a reasonable period after judgment is delivered in those proceedings.  The time provided for in order 1(a) is a reasonable period of time in the circumstances. 

  3. Secondly, in circumstances where the parties are apparently agreed that the plaintiff’s costs of these proceedings be fixed in the amount of $12,245.80, it is appropriate to order the defendant to pay those costs in that amount but I consider that the time for doing so should not be 3 January 2014 as proposed by the plaintiff, but 3 February 2014. 

  4. Orders will be made accordingly. 

I certify that the preceding four (4) numbered paragraphs are a true copy of the Reasons for Judgment herein of the Honourable Justice Griffiths.

Associate:

Dated:       23 December 2013

Details
AGLC
Deputy Commissioner of Taxation v T.D. Preece Pty Ltd (No 2) [2013] FCA 1421
Case
[2013] FCA 1421
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In the case of Deputy Commissioner of Taxation v T.D. Preece Pty Ltd (No 2), the plaintiff, the Deputy Commissioner of Taxation, sought to enforce payment of outstanding tax liabilities owed by the defendant, T.D. Preece Pty Ltd. The dispute arose out of an earlier judgment delivered in Deputy Commissioner of Taxation v T.D. Preece Pty Ltd [2013] FCA 1365, where the court found in favour of the plaintiff on several counts. The matter before the Federal Court was the formulation of orders that would give effect to the earlier judgment.

The key legal issues before the court were whether the proposed orders accurately reflected the court's reasons for judgment and whether they were appropriate in the circumstances. Specifically, the court needed to determine the reasonableness of the timeframe for full payment of the tax liabilities following the conclusion of related proceedings in the Supreme Court, as well as the appropriateness of the timing for the defendant to pay the plaintiff's costs.

Justice Griffiths concluded that the orders proposed by the plaintiff were appropriate and accurately reflected the reasons for judgment. The court accepted the plaintiff's submission that a reasonable period should be allowed for full payment of the tax liabilities following the conclusion of the related Supreme Court proceedings, considering Mr Preece's current inability to deal with his personal assets before those proceedings are finalised. The court found the timeframe provided in the proposed orders to be reasonable. Furthermore, the court agreed that the defendant should pay the plaintiff's costs in the amount of $12,245.80, but decided to adjust the deadline for payment to 3 February 2014, rather than the earlier date proposed by the plaintiff.

The court made orders requiring the defendant to pay the outstanding tax liabilities and costs, with specific timelines and conditions. Failure to comply with these orders would result in the winding up of the defendant company and the appointment of a liquidator. The court also noted that general interest charges would continue to accrue on outstanding amounts payable by the defendant to the plaintiff. The orders did not affect the plaintiff's right to take any other recovery action available in respect of the outstanding tax liabilities or other amounts due.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.