| [2022] FWCA 2937 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
| DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.217 - Application to vary an agreement to remove an ambiguity or uncertainty
Department of Environment, Land, Water and Planning
(AG2022/3560)
Field Staff and Wild Dog Controllers Agreement 2021
| State and Territory government administration | |
| COMMISSIONER YILMAZ | MELBOURNE, 31 AUGUST 2022 |
Application for variation of the Field Staff and Wild Dog Controllers Agreement 2021 to remove uncertainty or ambiguity - application granted.
The Department of Environment, Land, Water and Planning (the Applicant) has made an application pursuant to s.217(1) of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act) to remove an ambiguity or uncertainty in the Field Staff and Wild Dog Controllers Agreement 2021[1] (Agreement).
The Agreement was approved with undertakings by the Commission on 4 March 2022 and the Applicant agreed to file an s.217 application subsequent to approval.[2] During the process of seeking approval of the Agreement, the Applicant identified numerous cross-referencing and clause numbering errors in the Agreement document and seeks to correct the errors by way of an application pursuant to s.217 of the Act.
The Applicant submits that the cross-referencing errors lead to uncertainty and ambiguity as the correct clause references cannot be easily ascertained. The corrections sought by the Applicant are as follows:
· That the words “clause Error! Reference source not found.. clause Error! Reference source not found” in clause 2.23 of the Agreement are substituted with the words “clause 42.5(a), clause 47.4”;
· That the reference to clause 33.31 in clause 3.2(a) of the Agreement is substituted with a reference to clause 33.1;
· That the words “Right to Request Flexible Working Arrangements” appearing in the table at clause 8.3 of the Agreement are substituted with the words “Flexible Working Arrangements – Specific Circumstances”;
· That the reference to clause 18(a) in clause 18.2(b) of the Agreement is substituted with a reference to clause 18.2(a);
· That the reference to clause 13.3(a) in clause 18.3(b) of the Agreement is substituted with a reference to clause 18.3(a);
· That the words “clause Error! Reference source not found..” in clause 19.2(b) of the Agreement are substituted with a reference to clause 18.3;
· That clause 39.5 of the Agreement with the subheading ‘Allowable expenses include” is renumbered as clause 39.6;
· That clauses 39.6, 39.7 and 39.8 of the current Agreement are renumbered as clauses 39.7, 39.8 and 39.9 respectively;
· That the reference to clause 39.6 in clause 39.5(b) of the current Agreement is substituted with a reference to clause 39.7;
· That the reference to clause 39.7 in clause 39.5(c) of the current Agreement is substituted with a reference to clause 39.8;
· That the reference to clause 39.7(c) in clause 39.8 of the current Agreement is substituted with a reference to clause 39.8(c);
· That clauses 1.2, 41.1, 41.4, 41.5, 41.6, 41.7 and 41.8 are renumbered as clauses 41.1, 41.2, 41.3, 41.4, 41.5, 41.6 and 41.7 respectively;
· That clause 1.3 of the Agreement is deleted;
· That clauses 41.7(c)-(d) of the current Agreement are renumbered as clauses 41.6(a)-(b);
· That clauses 41.8(e)-(i) of the current Agreement are renumbered as clauses 41.7(a)-(e);
· That the reference to subclause (a) in clause 42.6 of the Agreement is substituted with a reference to clause 42.5(a);
· That the reference to clauses 45.5 and 45.645.5 at clause 45.3(a) of the Agreement is substituted with a reference to clauses 45.4 and 45.5; and
· That the words “clause Error! Reference source not found.;” in clause 58.7(a)(i) of the Agreement are substituted with a reference to clause 51.
I note that the Australian Workers' Union, a bargaining representative for the Agreement, has indicated its support for the variation.
I am satisfied that the clauses, as varied, will resolve the ambiguity and uncertainty created by the numbering and cross-referencing errors identified by the Applicant. A copy of the Agreement as varied by this decision is attached.
In accordance with s.217 of the Act, the variation operates from 31 August 2022.
COMMISSIONER
[1] AE515222.
[2] [2022] FWCA 778.
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<AE515222 PR745171>
- AGLC
- Department of Environment, Land, Water and Planning [2022] FWCA 2937
- Case
- [2022] FWCA 2937
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issue before the Commission was whether the proposed amendments to the agreement were justified to ensure clarity and eliminate any potential ambiguities. The applicants argued that certain terms in the existing agreement were open to interpretation and could lead to disputes and inconsistencies in implementation. The Department, on the other hand, contended that the existing agreement was sufficient and that the proposed changes were not necessary. The Commission had to weigh the arguments of both parties and decide whether the proposed amendments would indeed achieve the desired clarity and fairness in the agreement.
In reaching its decision, the Commission considered the purpose of the agreement, the context in which it was made, and the need for clear and unambiguous terms. The Commission found that the proposed changes were necessary to ensure that the agreement could be interpreted and applied consistently and fairly. The Commission also noted that the changes were in line with the objectives of the agreement and would not unduly disadvantage either party. Accordingly, the Commission granted the application and authorised the variations to the agreement to remove any uncertainty or ambiguity.
The final orders of the Commission included the approval of the proposed variations to the Field Staff and Wild Dog Controllers Agreement 2021, effective from the date of the decision. The changes aimed to clarify certain terms and eliminate any potential ambiguities that could lead to disputes or inconsistencies in the implementation of the agreement. Both parties were required to abide by the amended agreement and ensure that it was applied consistently and fairly in their respective dealings.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.