Delaney on behalf of the Quandamooka People v State of Queensland
Case
•
[2011] FCA 741
•4 July 2011
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
Delaney on behalf of the Quandamooka People v State of Queensland [2011] null 741
[2011] FCA 741
4 July 2011
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The Federal Court of Australia heard a case involving a dispute over native title between the Quandamooka People and the State of Queensland. The Quandamooka People, represented by their representative Delaney, sought a declaration of native title over certain lands and waters in Queensland, while the State of Queensland contested the claim. The court was tasked with determining whether native title existed in the disputed area and, if so, the nature and extent of the native title rights and interests held by the Quandamooka People. The case required the court to consider the historical context, the traditional laws and customs of the Quandamooka People, and the impact of existing legal rights and interests on the native title claim.
The court's decision focused on whether the Quandamooka People had maintained a connection to the land and waters in question, consistent with their traditional laws and customs, since before the assertion of sovereignty by the Crown. The court also considered the impact of existing legal rights and interests, such as leases and mining rights, on the native title claim. The determination was made in light of the Native Title Act 1993 (Cth), which provides the legal framework for recognising and protecting native title in Australia.
The Federal Court found that native title existed in the part of the Determination Area identified in Part A of Schedule 2, but not in the part identified in Part B. The court recognised the native title rights and interests of the Quandamooka People, which varied depending on the specific area in question. The court outlined the rights and interests in relation to land, water, and traditional natural resources, while also noting that the native title did not confer exclusive possession, occupation, use, and enjoyment of the land and water. The court also determined that the native title was not to be held in trust and appointed the Quandamooka Yoolooburrabee Aboriginal Corporation as the prescribed body corporate for the native title holders.
The court's decision provided a detailed determination of the native title rights and interests of the Quandamooka People, taking into account the traditional laws and customs of the group, the impact of existing legal rights and interests, and the provisions of the Native Title Act 1993 (Cth). The determination sets out the specific areas where native title exists, the nature and extent of the native title rights and interests, and the relationship between the native title rights and interests and other legal rights and interests in the Determination Area.
The court's decision focused on whether the Quandamooka People had maintained a connection to the land and waters in question, consistent with their traditional laws and customs, since before the assertion of sovereignty by the Crown. The court also considered the impact of existing legal rights and interests, such as leases and mining rights, on the native title claim. The determination was made in light of the Native Title Act 1993 (Cth), which provides the legal framework for recognising and protecting native title in Australia.
The Federal Court found that native title existed in the part of the Determination Area identified in Part A of Schedule 2, but not in the part identified in Part B. The court recognised the native title rights and interests of the Quandamooka People, which varied depending on the specific area in question. The court outlined the rights and interests in relation to land, water, and traditional natural resources, while also noting that the native title did not confer exclusive possession, occupation, use, and enjoyment of the land and water. The court also determined that the native title was not to be held in trust and appointed the Quandamooka Yoolooburrabee Aboriginal Corporation as the prescribed body corporate for the native title holders.
The court's decision provided a detailed determination of the native title rights and interests of the Quandamooka People, taking into account the traditional laws and customs of the group, the impact of existing legal rights and interests, and the provisions of the Native Title Act 1993 (Cth). The determination sets out the specific areas where native title exists, the nature and extent of the native title rights and interests, and the relationship between the native title rights and interests and other legal rights and interests in the Determination Area.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Indigenous Peoples & Native Title Law
Legal Concepts
-
Native Title Determination
-
Native Title Rights
-
Aboriginal Corporations
-
Traditional Laws and Customs
-
Native Title Act 1993 (Cth)
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Most Recent Citation
Burns v Redland City Council [2025] QDC 15
Cases Citing This Decision
8
Ball v Eric Child and Sons Pty Ltd
[2025] QDC 81
Burns v Redland City Council
[2025] QDC 15
Parkin on behalf of the Quandamooka People v State of Queensland
[2020] FCA 1132
Cases Cited
2
Statutory Material Cited
0
Director General, Department of Land and Water Conservation v Bailey
[2003] NSWCCA 361