DELAINE & DELAINE

In the matter of *Delaine & Delaine*, heard before Judge Obradovic, the applicant sought to establish contraventions of parenting orders by the respondent. The specific nature of the alleged contraventions and the parenting orders in question were not detailed in the provided text, but the core of the dispute revolved around whether the respondent had failed to comply with the existing orders.

The central legal issue before the court was to determine whether the evidence presented by the applicant was sufficient to prove, on the balance of probabilities, that the respondent had contravened the parenting orders. This required the court to assess the factual allegations against the legal standard for establishing a contravention under the relevant family law legislation.

Judge Obradovic found that the applicant had not discharged the onus of proof. The court concluded that the alleged contraventions were not established on the balance of probabilities, meaning the evidence did not sufficiently demonstrate that the respondent had failed to comply with the parenting orders. Consequently, the application seeking to establish these contraventions was dismissed.