Dee-Tech Pty Ltd v Neddam Holdings Pty Ltd

In the matter of *Dee-Tech Pty Ltd v Neddam Holdings Pty Ltd*, the Court of Appeal considered a motion for leave to adduce further evidence.

The central legal issue before the Court was whether the motion for leave to adduce further evidence should be heard by the Full Court, as part of the appeal, or by a single judge.

Handley AJA determined that the motion for leave to adduce further evidence was a matter for the Full Court hearing the appeal. The Court then made detailed orders regarding the filing and service of further evidence, amended motions, supplementary submissions, and the attendance of deponents for cross-examination, setting specific timelines for each. The costs of the motion were reserved to the Full Court.