De Silva and Rogers (No. 2)
Case
•
[2014] FamCA 1034
•6 November 2014
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
De Silva and Rogers (No. 2) [2014] FamCA 1034
[2014] FamCA 1034
6 November 2014
CaseChat Overview and Summary
In *De Silva and Rogers (No. 2)*, Hannam J of the Supreme Court of New South Wales considered an application to admit a document into evidence. The dispute concerned the admissibility of a transcript of a judgment from the District Court of New South Wales, which was annexed to the father's affidavit.
The central legal issue before the court was whether the District Court transcript should be admitted as evidence in the present proceedings.
Hannam J determined that the transcript was admissible. The reasoning for this decision is not elaborated upon in the provided text, but the order indicates the court's acceptance of the document as evidence.
The court ordered that the document, identified as Annexure "N" in the father's affidavit, being the transcript of the judgment of the District Court of New South Wales, be admitted.
The central legal issue before the court was whether the District Court transcript should be admitted as evidence in the present proceedings.
Hannam J determined that the transcript was admissible. The reasoning for this decision is not elaborated upon in the provided text, but the order indicates the court's acceptance of the document as evidence.
The court ordered that the document, identified as Annexure "N" in the father's affidavit, being the transcript of the judgment of the District Court of New South Wales, be admitted.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Civil Procedure
-
Evidence
Legal Concepts
-
Appeal
-
Expert Evidence
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Cases Citing This Decision
0
Cases Cited
2
Statutory Material Cited
2
MALUKA & MALUKA
[2012] FamCA 373
Blan and Faulconer Blan (No 2)
[2014] FamCA 878