DD v AA; DD v Lewis; DD v PP

Case

[2023] NSWCA 140

22 June 2023


Details
AGLC Case Decision Date
DD v AA; DD v Lewis; DD v PP [2023] NSWCA 140 [2023] NSWCA 140 22 June 2023

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In the matters of *DD v AA*, *DD v Lewis*, and *DD v PP*, the appellant, DD, sought various orders including an adjournment, the appointment of a tutor, a stay of proceedings, leave to adduce fresh evidence, leave to amend the notice of appeal, and opposed a motion for dismissal. The respondents, AA, Lewis, and PP, sought to have the appeals dismissed and sought security for their costs. The applications were heard by Griffiths AJA in the Supreme Court of New South Wales.

The primary legal issues before the Court were whether the appellant had established sufficient grounds for an adjournment, whether the requirements for appointing a tutor had been met, whether a stay of proceedings was warranted, whether fresh evidence should be permitted, whether the notice of appeal could be amended, and whether the appeals should be dismissed. Crucially, the Court also had to determine if special circumstances existed to justify an order for security for costs, given the appellant's previous appeal had been dismissed for failure to provide security.

Griffiths AJA dismissed the applications for adjournment, tutor, and stay, finding that the medical evidence provided was insufficient and that the Uniform Civil Procedure Rules requirements had not been met. The Court also dismissed the application to amend the notice of appeal. While the motions for fresh evidence and dismissal were adjourned to the hearing of the appeal, the Court ordered the appellant to provide security for the respondents' costs, in the amount of $20,000 for *DD v AA* and *DD v Lewis*, and $32,000 for *DD v PP*. The Court reasoned that there was no suggestion that the appeals would be rendered nugatory by an order for security, and that the appellant had not demonstrated that such an order would stultify the proceedings, particularly in light of a prior appeal being dismissed for non-compliance with a security for costs order. Proceedings were stayed until the security was provided, with liberty to the respondents to apply for dismissal if the security was not furnished by the specified date.
Details

Areas of Law

  • Civil Procedure

Legal Concepts

  • Appeal

  • Costs

  • Stay of Proceedings

Actions
Download as PDF Download as Word Document

Most Recent Citation
AA v PD (No 2) [2023] NSWSC 945

Cases Citing This Decision

6

Cases Cited

24

Statutory Material Cited

7

Brown v King [2022] NSWCA 75