Dayleford and Himmett

The proceeding concerned a dispute between Dayleford and Himmett, heard by Cronin J. The specific nature of the dispute is not detailed, but the court's orders indicate it involved matters requiring the creation and sealing of minutes of proposed orders.

The central legal issue before the court was to determine the terms of the final orders to be made by consent between the parties. This involved the court's consideration and approval of the minutes of proposed orders presented by the parties.

Cronin J made orders by consent in accordance with the minutes of proposed orders marked as Exhibit "A". These minutes were sealed and attached to the court's record, and were directed to remain on the court file. The solicitor for the husband was directed to engross these minutes and deliver them electronically to the Associate within seven days. Further, any material produced under subpoena was to be returned to its recipient, and the judge's reasons for judgment were to be transcribed and placed on the court file.