Davison and Hannigan (No.2)
Case
•
[2019] FCCA 877
•18 March 2019
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
Davison and Hannigan (No.2) [2019] FCCA 877
[2019] FCCA 877
18 March 2019
CaseChat Overview and Summary
In *Davison and Hannigan (No.2)*, the parties were Davison and Hannigan. The nature of the dispute is not specified in the provided text, but the matter came before Judge Young. The court's final orders indicate an adjournment to a future date before a different judge.
The specific legal issues before Judge Young are not detailed in the provided excerpt. However, the outcome suggests that the proceedings were not concluded and required further determination by another judicial officer.
Given the limited information, the court's reasoning and the legal principles applied cannot be ascertained. The sole order made was for the matter to be adjourned to a date to be advised, to be heard by a different judge.
The specific legal issues before Judge Young are not detailed in the provided excerpt. However, the outcome suggests that the proceedings were not concluded and required further determination by another judicial officer.
Given the limited information, the court's reasoning and the legal principles applied cannot be ascertained. The sole order made was for the matter to be adjourned to a date to be advised, to be heard by a different judge.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Civil Procedure
Legal Concepts
-
Costs
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Cases Citing This Decision
0
Cases Cited
2
Statutory Material Cited
2
CPJ16 v Minister for Home Affairs
[2020] FCAFC 212
CPJ16 v Minister for Home Affairs
[2020] FCAFC 212