Davidson and Hunt

In *Davidson and Hunt*, heard before Rees J, the wife sought orders pursuant to s90MT(4) of the *Family Law Act 1975* (Cth). The court was required to determine the wife's application and make consequential orders regarding the parties' jointly owned timeshare property and other financial matters.

The court was required to determine the wife's application under s90MT(4) of the *Family Law Act 1975* (Cth). In addition, the court had to make orders concerning the sale of the parties' jointly owned timeshare property, the management and rental of unused timeshare weeks, the provision of financial documents by the wife, the distribution of dividends from specific companies, the removal of the husband's name from the wife's residential lease, and the closure or transfer of joint bank accounts.

Rees J dismissed the wife's application under s90MT(4). The court ordered the sale of the jointly owned timeshare property, outlining a specific process for listing, price reduction, and relisting if it remained unsold. The proceeds of sale were to be applied first to sale costs and maintenance fees, with the balance divided equally. The wife was ordered to rent out any unused timeshare weeks, with rental income to be applied to maintenance fees, and any excess retained by her as part property settlement. The wife was also directed to provide various financial documents and respond to specific letters. The court also made orders regarding the distribution of dividends from Caribbean Investments Pty Ltd and Davidson Pty Ltd, the removal of the husband's name from the wife's lease, and the closure of joint bank accounts unless the wife provided notice to transfer them into her sole name.