| [2023] FWC 850 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
| DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.394—Unfair dismissal
David Conole
v
A.C.U.G
(U2023/1917)
| COMMISSIONER BISSETT | MELBOURNE, 6 APRIL 2023 |
Application for an unfair dismissal remedy
On 8 March 2023 David Conole made an application to the Fair Work Commission for a remedy for unfair dismissal pursuant to s.394 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (FW Act).
The application was incomplete in that Mr Conole did not pay the required fee or file a completed waiver form.
On 10 March 2023 the Commission emailed correspondence to Mr Conole’s nominated email address advising that his application required payment of the filing fee or a completed waiver form if he wished to proceed with the application. That correspondence also warned that if payment is not made or a waiver form is not received within 7 calendar days the application may be dismissed.
On 13 March 2023 an SMS notification was sent to Mr Conole’s nominated telephone number advising of the requirement to action the payment request email from the Fair Work Commission.
On 14 March 2023 the Commission again sent correspondence to Mr Conole’s nominated email address reminding him that his application required payment of the filing fee or a completed waiver form if he wished to proceed with the application. That correspondence also warned that if payment is not made or a waiver form is not received, the application may be dismissed.
A final attempt to contact Mr Conole on their nominated telephone number was made by the Commission on 16 March 2023 to obtain payment or a completed waiver form. The call was not answered.
To date there has been no response from Mr Conole, the required fee has not been paid and a completed waiver form has not been received.
Section 395 of the FW Act, which deals with application fees, provides as follows:
395 Application fees
(1) An application to the FWC under this Division must be accompanied by any fee prescribed by the regulations.
(2) The regulations may prescribe:
(a) a fee for making an application to the FWC under this Division; and
(b) a method for indexing the fee; and
(c) the circumstances in which all or part of the fee may be waived or refunded.
Section 587(1) of the FW Act provides as follows:
587 Dismissing applications
(1) Without limiting when the FWC may dismiss an application, the FWC may dismiss an application if:
(a) the application is not made in accordance with this Act; or
(b) the application is frivolous or vexatious; or
(c) the application has no reasonable prospect of success.
I am satisfied that, as the application was not accompanied by the fee prescribed by the FW Act, the application was not made in accordance with the FW Act. As such, the application is dismissed pursuant to s.587(1)(a) of the FW Act.
COMMISSIONER
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<PR760965>
- AGLC
- David Conole v A.C.U.G [2023] FWC 850
- Case
- [2023] FWC 850
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The Fair Work Act 2009 stipulates that applications to the FWC must be accompanied by the prescribed fee, and it allows the FWC to dismiss applications that do not comply with the Act. The Act also permits the dismissal of applications that are frivolous or vexatious or have no reasonable prospect of success. Given that Mr Conole's application lacked the required fee, the FWC found that it was not made in accordance with the Act. Therefore, the application was dismissed under section 587(1)(a) of the FW Act. The Commission determined that the application was not frivolous or vexatious but that it was dismissed purely due to non-compliance with the statutory requirements.
In conclusion, the application by David Conole for an unfair dismissal remedy was dismissed by the Fair Work Commission due to non-compliance with the Fair Work Act 2009. The application was found to be invalid as it did not include the necessary fee or a completed waiver form, which are required by law. The Commission did not find the application to be frivolous or vexatious, but dismissed it on the basis that it did not adhere to the statutory requirements.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.